From: oldernow@dev.null   
      
   On 2025-04-07, Richmond  wrote:   
      
   >>>>>>> Only if you require proof of everything. But actually, making   
   >>>>>>> assumptions is quite normal. There is no reason you can't assume   
   >>>>>>> that sense evidence is a source of knowledge, without being able to   
   >>>>>>> prove it. But what you have done is said that it is problematic to   
   >>>>>>> manage without it and therefore someone else must prove it is   
   >>>>>>> false. How could someone prove than sense evidence is not a source   
   >>>>>>> of knowledge? by proving that no piece of knowledge was ever   
   >>>>>>> derived from sense evidence?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The proof is in the believing.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Or so "I" believe, at any rate....   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The reader observed finding this, which the writer might like:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://archive.org/details/NagarjunaTheFundamentalWisdomO   
   TheMiddleWay/page/n51/mode/2up?view=theater   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> "Not only does suffering not exist In any of the fourfold ways: No   
   >>>>> external entity exists In any of the fourfold ways."   
   >>>>   
   >>>> How *DARE* you attempt to peddle solipsist tripe in these sacred,   
   >>>> hallowed textural grounds!   
   >>>   
   >>> Subjective pronoun error. How dare you use the word 'you'   
   >>> when you don't exist.   
   >>   
   >> Other cartoon characters do it all the time.   
   >   
   > Two wrongs don't make a writer.   
      
   Heart!!!   
      
   --   
   NPC's dutifully ignored.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)