Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 170,071 of 170,335    |
|    D to All    |
|    To the solipsist.    |
|    09 Apr 25 21:36:18    |
      From: nospam@example.net              Some random thoughts from an email discussion targeted toward the       solipsist. Enjoy! =)              Ask him if he believes: "Every rule has an exception."              If he says no, then there are rules thay have no exceptions. I.e. there exist       inviolable laws. So in addition to the existence of his mind there are also       laws.              If he says yes, then the rule "Every rule has an exception" would itself also       have an exception, which again implies there are some rules without exceptions.       Which are inviolable laws. Therefore laws exist.              This might seem like a parlor trick, but it is just showing how the logical       inconsistency of the statement "Every rule has an exception." Forces us to to       see that it is false, and therefore the converse of that statement is       necessarily true.              The necessary truth of the converse "not every rule has an exception" implies       there are rules that have no exceptions, so there are laws, there is order, and       reality is law-governed.              Now, if only we can work out what those laws are.. And that is what science is       about: figuring out the laws that explain the kinds of experiences we have.              OR              Even if this conscious state is an illusion, there still must be something       responsible for that illusory conscious state.              OR              Functionalism might be another path. If the solipsist accepts functionalism,       then even if the other people they see are only figments of their imagination,       then their imagination must be performing a process at least as complex as is       necessary to generate the appearance of intelligent conscious behavior, and       such processing would necessarily invoke the consciousness associated with       such a complex process.              Fun thoughts to play around with. =)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca