Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.philosophy    |    Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?    |    170,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 170,135 of 170,335    |
|    Ed Cryer to Richmond    |
|    Re: Fundamental    |
|    21 Apr 25 19:58:37    |
   
   From: ed@somewhere.in.the.uk   
      
   Richmond wrote:   
   > Ed Cryer writes:   
   >   
   >> Richmond wrote:   
   >>> If something is fundamental, then it ought to be understood by everyone   
   >>> (present).   
   >>   
   >> How so? There appears to be no logical or linguistic connection   
   >> between "fundamental" and "understood by everyone (present)".   
   >>   
   >> Ed   
   >   
   > Because if it is not understood by everyone it is too complicated to be   
   > fundamental.   
      
   That's very unphilosophical.   
   The best I can make of it is that you're using "fundamental" where I'd   
   use "axiomatic".   
      
   Language isn't like Euclidean geometry, which is founded on a few   
   postulates from which everything follows inevitably.   
   Language isn't an axiom system.   
   Look up "Hume's Fork".   
      
   Ed   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca