home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.philosophy      Didn't Freud have sex with his mother?      170,335 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 170,314 of 170,335   
   Mild Shock to Mild Shock   
   The French Square Wheele Bicycle of Logi   
   05 Dec 25 20:01:26   
   
   XPost: sci.logic, comp.theory   
   From: janburse@fastmail.fm   
      
   Hi,   
      
   I always admired the French Teaching of Logic.   
   This silly Philosophy Professor scolded me a couple   
   of times with this nonsense, playing dumb and deaf,   
      
   like a complete idiot:   
      
   Me: LEM is derivable from RAA, in minimal logic.   
   Prof: LEM is not even derivable from RAA in intuitionistic logic.   
   Me: You didn’t use RAA as an inference schema!   
   Prof: Our discussion is about logic and not about Prolog. I apologize.   
   https://swi-prolog.discourse.group/t/needing-help-with-call-with   
   depth-limit-3/7398/78   
      
   Still his prover demonstrates LEM from RAA:   
      
   ?-prove((a | ~a)).   
   \begin{prooftree}   
   \AxiomC{\scriptsize{1}}   
   \noLine   
   \UnaryInfC{$ \lnot (A \lor  \lnot A)$}   
   \RightLabel{\scriptsize{$ \lor\to E$}}   
   \UnaryInfC{$ \lnot  \lnot A$}   
   \AxiomC{\scriptsize{1}}   
   \noLine   
   \UnaryInfC{$ \lnot (A \lor  \lnot A)$}   
   \RightLabel{\scriptsize{$ \lor\to E$}}   
   \UnaryInfC{$ \lnot A$}   
   \RightLabel{\scriptsize{$ \to E $}}   
   \BinaryInfC{$\bot$}   
   \RightLabel{\scriptsize{$ IP $}  1}   
   \UnaryInfC{$A \lor  \lnot A$}   
   \end{prooftree}   
   https://g4-mic.vidal-rosset.net/wasm/tinker#prove((a%20%7C%20~a)).   
      
   Please note that RAA = IP, synonymous names.   
   Reductio Ad Absurdum and Indirect Proof.   
      
   LoL   
      
   Bye   
      
   Mild Shock schrieb:   
   > Hi,   
   >   
   > In the coming age of analog computing,   
   > symbolic logic means nothing:   
   >   
   > “The high data-rate sense perception and   
   > identification abilities of the human system   
   > mostly bypass verbal/analytic awareness. We   
   >   are generally conscious of a cognitive   
   > recognition after the fact. In this way, what   
   > we understand as consciousness has to be   
   > identified as a reflexive monitoring ability   
   > with quite limited application. To produce   
   > consciousness (artificial or otherwise) we   
   > are stepping down, not up.”   
   > ― Frank Herbert, Destination: Void   
   >   
   > Bye   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca