From: dnomhcir@gmx.com   
      
   Interferon  writes:   
      
   > I propose that the classical anthropic principle, for which the   
   > presence of *living* observers in a "fine-tuned universe" directly   
   > explaines the universe's suitability for life, as hostile universes   
   > could not produce observers, can be extended to account for many   
   > properties of life.   
   >   
   > The quantifiability of the macroscale. For which numerics apply in a   
   > fashion that takes well to biological neural networks, is an intrinsic   
   > property of reality that allows for the development of intellegent   
   > life.  This ^ is taken as mathematical skill transcends species   
   > boundries (not learned) and must therefore have a neurological basis.   
   >   
   > It is taken, that had realities' intrinsic qualities been more complex   
   > or convoluted, that intellegent life would have been harder to   
   > develop.  This ^ is under the assumption that physical constraints   
   > remain equal in this reality. As a result, neurons would have the same   
   > physical and biological constraints and tradeoffs, leading to the same   
   > behaviour above.   
   >   
   > It is taken that an early and easy quantificationary ability of early   
   > intellegent species is critical to technological bootstrapping. Which   
   > is the man-made selective pressures insubstantiated by its development   
   > of its own technology (such as fire, or the wheel), which then go-on   
   > to influence its own evolution in a re-enforcive manner.   
   >   
   > Others as well. Lot more, too tired.   
      
   I think you might be describing the fitness beats truth theory. Is that   
   correct?   
      
   What is 'The quantifiability of the macroscale.'?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)