XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: pothead@snakebite.com
squalk wrote:
>squalk wrote:
>> squalk wrote:
>>> pothead wrote:
>>>> On 2025-12-20, c186282 wrote:
>>>>> On 12/19/25 23:00, pothead wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-12-20, c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/19/25 13:23, useapen wrote:
>>>>>>>> Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> | The Trump administration is moving to dismantle the
>>>>>>>>>>> | National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado,
>>>>>>>>>>> | according to a senior White House official, taking aim at
>>>>>>>>>>> | one of the world's leading climate research labs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> |
>>>
>>>> What I mean is that the climate has been changing since the beginning
>>>> of time
>>>> and that there is little to nothing mankind can do to change it.
>>>>
>>>> The climate change MOVEMENt, ie:green new deal and such IS a total
money
>>>> making scam.
>>>>> but what IS a scam is how people believe they
>>>>>> can change it.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's true, or mostly true.
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Learn from the past and move on instead of trying to continually
>>>> relive it.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Why are there no results, showing improvments for all that the earth
>>> has been investing in reducing global warming, over the years.
>>>
>>> Will we invest all the resources of the earth, to no avail?
>>>>
>> -----------------------------------------------
>>
>> Huge acreage under solar panels, huge acreage under 600 ft generators.
>>
>> We claim to know the temperature of the earth to a fraction of a degree,
>> but we can't find a quantity small enough to show how our efforts have
>> reduced warming.
>>
>> Are we on the right track?
>
>---------------------------------
>
>Are we on the right track, if the result of all our efforts to date is
>too small to measure?
>
Science is overrated and costs too much. Most of them find shit we don't
like too.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
