XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: pothead@snakebite.com
On 2026-01-03, Governor Swill wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 22:27:35 -0000 (UTC), pothead
> wrote:
>
>>On 2026-01-02, Governor Swill wrote:
>>> On Thu, 01 Jan 2026 19:06:52 -0500, Governor Swill
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 31 Dec 2025 16:30:20 -0500, Governor Swill
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 16:46:42 -0000 (UTC), pothead
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Give up because you simply will never convince anyone but a fellow
>>>>>>TDS sufferer that the media is fair to Trump.
>>>>>
>>>>>I never said it was. I only disagreed that it was "almost 100% anti
>>>>>Trump, 24x7."
>>>>>
>>>>>If you can't get your facts straight, stfu.
>>>>>
>>>>>Btw, what happened to the $20T in investments he claims he brought to
>>>>>the US this year?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Still waiting, pothead. Where is the $17-$20 trillion Trump says he
>>> brought to the US as investment capital?
>>
>>I don't believe I said that.
>
> No, you didn't and I never claimed you did. My point is your opinion
> of negative coverage of Trump. Well here's one. He said had brought
> in $17-$20 trillion in new investment into our economy.
I've presented various studies from different outlets clearly demonstrating
the massive percentage of negative vs positive coverage of Trump and it's not
even close.
You simply cannot deny this.
> The press pointed at laughed at the idiocy of such a claim. Does that
> count as negative press?
You are moving the goal posts again.
>>My argument was about the media being 90 plus percent negative against Trump.
>>Have a MID?
>
> You said 100% and are now back pedaling without having the grace to
> openly admit you made a mistake or apologize for it.
MID please.
> The fact remains, Trump said it and was *accurately* reported as being
> a liar. Do you consider that "negative press"?
I consider not reporting on his successes or lying by omission unfair.
And the various studies prove that beyond a doubt.
Just the other day Dana Bash of CNN was forced to admit that Trump did get
the border under control.
She looked like she had just swallowed a raw lemon.
That is an exception to the rule and in no way cancels out the years of
negative
press they attack Trump with.
> The international press has reported that drug makers in both the US
> and Europe have agreed to raise prices on a list of common drugs
> despite pressure from the Trump administration. That is fact and has
> been reported everywhere except, as far as I can find, Fox. I
> included "fox news" in my search terms for this story and still found
> no Fox report on it. Nor was I able to find it searching at Fox.com.
You're all over the place here.
A single incident != 90 plus percent negative coverage of Trump by the MSM.
> So tell us, whose reporting is more accurate and complete on these
> stories?
Goal post move.
I've presented various studies from different outlets clearly demonstrating
the massive percentage of negative vs positive coverage of Trump and it's not
even close.
You simply cannot deny this.
If you want to make an apples to apples comparison look at the coverage
Biden, Harris and Waltz got from the press vs what Trump got in terms
of negative vs positive.
That should keep you busy for a while.
--
pothead
“Liberals seem to assume that, if you don’t believe in their particular
political solutions, then you don’t really care about
the people that they claim to want to help.”
― Thomas Sowell
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
