XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: chine.bleu@yahoo.com   
      
   Governor Swill wrote:   
   > On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 18:33:02 -0000 (UTC), pothead   
   >  wrote:   
      
   >> I've presented various studies from different outlets clearly demonstrating   
   >> the massive percentage of negative vs positive coverage of Trump and it's   
   not   
   >> even close.   
   >   
   > You said 100%.  This is not true.   
   >   
   >> You simply cannot deny this.   
   >   
   > I can and do.   
      
   The first was enacted so that nobody can be charged with a crime for   
   what they say or publish. Nor can they be prevented from expressing   
   themselves. They answer to their consumers, not the government.   
      
   > Does that count as negative press?   
      
   'Negative presss' is whining. It has no legal consequence.   
      
   >>> The fact remains, Trump said it and was *accurately* reported as being   
   >>> a liar.  Do you consider that "negative press"?   
   >>   
   >> I consider not reporting on his successes or lying by omission unfair.   
   >> And the various studies prove that beyond a doubt.   
   >   
   > What successes?   
      
   Are war crimes a success?   
      
   >> Just the other day Dana Bash of CNN was forced to admit that Trump did get   
   >> the border under control.   
   >   
   > Yes, he has.   
      
   Is violating asylum laws and the Bill of Rights a success?   
      
      
   --   
   Siri Seal of Disavowal #777-000. Disavowed. Denied.  @   
   NO KINGS    For I desire mercy not sacrifice.       /|\   
   The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 5.5        / \   
   of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)