XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: j63840576@gmail.com   
      
   pothead wrote:   
   > On 2026-01-07, NoBody  wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 15:55:19 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.   
   >> Sherman) wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. [R-LA], who cast the decisive vote to install   
   >>> RFK, Jr. as Chief Moron In Charge Of Health, is having regrets:   
   >>> |   
   >>> | As a doctor who treated patients for decades, my top   
   >>> | priority is protecting children and families. Multiple   
   >>> | children have died or were hospitalized from measles, and   
   >>> | South Carolina continues to face a growing outbreak. Two   
   >>> | children have died in my state from whooping cough. All of   
   >>> | this was preventable with safe and effective vaccines.   
   >>> |   
   >>> | The vaccine schedule IS NOT A MANDATE. It's a   
   >>> | recommendation giving parents the power. Changing the   
   >>> | pediatric vaccine schedule based on no scientific input on   
   >>> | safety risks and little transparency will cause unnecessary   
   >>> | fear for patients and doctors, and will make America sicker.   
   >>> |   
   >>>    
   >>>   
   >>>     --bks   
   >>   
   >> He just justified why the schedule changed.  The government should   
   >> reccommend what the minumums are and leave it to the parents and   
   >> doctors to decide anything else.  You are for that sort of thing   
   >> right?   
   >   
   > I am definitely not against vax or medications at all. But that doesn't mean   
   > that because of advances in science we can't further investigate the and   
   especially   
   > the side effects and the risk of young children receiving multiple different   
   > vaccines at the same time and things like that and adjust recommendations   
   accordingly.   
   > Parents also need to understand the risk vs reward aspect as well and as   
   some of   
   > these previously eradicated for the  most part, diseases are resurfacing that   
   > needs to be considered as well.   
   >   
      
   I agree that there exist certain sound reasons behind the vaccine   
   "consolidation." You won't get that notice from the Democrats here,   
   because it is a Republican and they are busy criticizing him. To think   
   that we would have exactly the same vaccine "suggestion" as in 1950 is   
   very naïve, but that is not something Democrats are ready to acknowledge   
   as they stand on their high horse about "evolution." Unfortunately like   
   many Republicans most Democrats are gingerbread cut from the same mold.   
      
   I'm a Libertarian.   
   --   
   xGytDsqkQY8   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)