XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: pothead@snakebite.com
On 2026-01-06, chine.bleu wrote:
> Governor Swill wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Jan 2026 18:33:02 -0000 (UTC), pothead
>> wrote:
>
>>> I've presented various studies from different outlets clearly demonstrating
>>> the massive percentage of negative vs positive coverage of Trump and it's
not
>>> even close.
>>
>> You said 100%. This is not true.
>>
>>> You simply cannot deny this.
>>
>> I can and do.
>
> The first was enacted so that nobody can be charged with a crime for
> what they say or publish. Nor can they be prevented from expressing
> themselves. They answer to their consumers, not the government.
Of course.
This isn't a free speech issue, it's a being in the tank for the Democrats
while attacking everything the Republicans do.
It's so obvious, which is why so many different outlets have published studies
some of which I posted.
Not that anyone needs a study as 15 minutes of watching CNN or MSNBC or the
local
affiliates will be enough for all but the most severely infect TDS sufferer to
realize.
>> Does that count as negative press?
>
> 'Negative presss' is whining. It has no legal consequence.
Nope.
When a party does something out of the norm that could be construed as wrong,
a mistake, etc there is nothing wrong with reporting it.
The question is HOW the MSM reports it.
Example: Trump holds onto a railing while walking down a slippery wooden ramp
wearing new shoes and the media is all over it reporting that Trump is having
age related issues.
Meanwhile in Biden land he's falling all over the place, wandering around
aimlessly
shaking hands with invisible people and the press says nothing other than being
forced to show it because it's a live feed.
Even still, the MSM attempts to crop shots, alter audio and so forth to attack
Trump.
>>>> The fact remains, Trump said it and was *accurately* reported as being
>>>> a liar. Do you consider that "negative press"?
>>>
>>> I consider not reporting on his successes or lying by omission unfair.
>>> And the various studies prove that beyond a doubt.
>>
>> What successes?
>
> Are war crimes a success?
Is putting a $25 million dollar bounty on a very bad person, Maduro, a crime?
Why put a bounty on a person if the idea isn't to capture him?
etter ask Joe Biden about that one.
Oh, and you might want to take a look at some of your democrat friends quotes
from
a few years ago demanding something be done about Maduro.
Chuck Schumer for one.
See that on MSNBC?
>>> Just the other day Dana Bash of CNN was forced to admit that Trump did get
>>> the border under control.
>>
>> Yes, he has.
>
> Is violating asylum laws and the Bill of Rights a success?
Is protecting the legal inhabitants of the USA by arresting criminals a
success?
You lefties are always so concerned about the rights of the bad guys.
It's actually sick IMHO.
The safety of America should be first and foremost on the POTUS list of job
roles.
America first = Trump
America last = Biden and the last administration.
And BTW there isn't a country on the planet where they don't feel the same
about
their country as well.
--
pothead
“Liberals seem to assume that, if you don’t believe in their particular
political solutions, then you don’t really care about
the people that they claim to want to help.”
― Thomas Sowell
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
