XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: invalid@none.com
In article ,
noemail@aol.com says...
>
> Socialism is for losers wrote in
> news:pbognk12o5pi93mtmtao7v758v56g4e70p@4ax.com:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 03:03:07 +0000, Mitchell Holman
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Skeeter wrote in news:MPG.43e1691c8f0d4b8698ae56
> >>@usnews.blocknews.net:
> >>
> >>> In article ,
> >>> noemail@aol.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> fauci's mask wrote in
> >>>> news:10l86i7$2l60d$1@dont-email.me:
> >>>>
> >>>> > On 1/26/26 11:36 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> >>>> >> fascist's mask wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>> On 1/26/26 9:26 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>> >>>> fauci's mask wrote in
> >>>> >>>> news:10l7qjq$2ho60$1@dont- email.me:
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>>> On 1/26/26 8:02 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>> Get shot in the back by Trump's thugs.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> --bks
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> He deserved it.
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> For doing what?
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> For being the dumbest fuck in Minneapolis. No permit (required
> to
> >>>> >>> carry in MN);
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> He had a permit.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Not on him, as required by law (Minnesota Statutes Section
> 624.714,
> >>>> > Subdivision 1b(a) The holder of a permit to carry *must have the
> >>>> > permit card and a driver's license, state identification card, or
> >>>> > other government-issued photo identification in immediate
> possession
> >>>> > at all times when carrying a pistol* and must display the permit
> >>card
> >>>> > and identification document upon lawful demand by a peace officer,
> >>as
> >>>> > defined in section 626.84, subdivision 1.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Show us this "lawful demand" by a
> >>>> peace office to produce his permit or
> >>>> drivers license.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >>> no government ID (required to carry in MN);
> >>>> >
> >>>> > See above.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> Where'd you get that factoid, from Bovino?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > The law, dork. Not that you give a rip about the law.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >>> interfered with an already stressful situation;
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> He was trying to protect a woman pushed down by a thug.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > He stuck his nose where it didn't belong. Due to his own stupidity
> >>he
> >>>> > found out the hard way.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >>> aggressive demeanor - getting directly in
> >>>> >>> the face of a Federal ICE agent and pressing into the agent to
> the
> >>>> >>> point that the agent put out his hand to prevent Pretti from
> >>moving
> >>>> >>> closer to the agent;
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Bullshit. He had his hands up, one empty and one holding a phone.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > He positioned himself to block or shield, having his phone right
> in
> >>>> > ICEā??s face.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So you admit he was shot holding a phone. Not a gun.
> >>>
> >>> No one but you said that.
> >>
> >>From the above, not me:
> >>
> >>
> >>"He positioned himself to block or shield,
> >>having his phone right in ICE's face"
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> And was shot in the back.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ten times.
> >>>
> >>> Prove it.
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>"While Pretti seems to have been pinned
> >>on the street by officers, one of the
> >>agents is seen in multiple verified videos
> >>emerging from the scrum with a handgun that
> >>appears to match the weapon federal officials
> >>say Pretti was carrying. Before the first
> >>shot is fired, another agent can be seen
> >>drawing his own handgun, while another
> >>repeatedly hits Pretti. In total, 10 shots
> >>were fired in less than five seconds, according
> >>to a forensic audio analysis of the videos.
> >>Pretti was declared dead on the scene."
> >>https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/minute-minute-timeline-fatal-shooting-
> >>alex-pretti-federal/story?id=129547199
> >
> > Headline:
> > Man with gun resists arrest. Permit to have a gun is not applicable.
> >
>
>
> Man witn gun disarmed, then shot in back.
Proof? No liberal biased bullshit.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
