XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: invalid@none.com
In article <10le8rq$t7us$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
>
> On 2026-01-28 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 15:09:14 -0800, Alan wrote:
> >
> >> On 2026-01-28 15:05, phoenix wrote:
> >>> Alan wrote:
> >>>> On 2026-01-28 14:54, phoenix wrote:
> >>>>> Alan wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-28 14:33, phoenix wrote:
> >>>>>>> Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-28 13:25, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:21:50 -0500, Governor Swill
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:36:19 +0000, Mitchell Holman
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.43e2accc5b842ea098ae63@usnews.blocknews.net:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10laqi3$3odrt$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> OFeem1987 @teleworm.us says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> fascist's mask wrote this post by blinking in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Morse code:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 9:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From your own cite:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "....must display the permit card and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identification document -----> upon lawful
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demand <---- by a peace officer"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When was Pretti ever asked for his permit?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Notwithstanding the dodge, I don't know, I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> never suggested that he was, and nor do I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> care. Doesn't matter with regard to the legal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> obligation to have the permit and ID on him.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice dodge yerself!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> He didn't have it on him. Why not?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ain't it grand seeing Second Amendment absolutists
> >>>>>>>>>>> complain that a gun control law wasn't being stictly
> >>>>>>>>>>> enforced?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Even more grand to watch them complain about
> >>>>>>>>>> Republicans violating their gun rights.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You have no gun rights when resisting arrest.
> >>>>>>>> How was he "resisting"?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> While I'm with the Democrats mostly on this subject, this is
> >>>>>>> not the strong point. He was resisting arrest by shoving his
> >>>>>>> camera in the guy's face. He wasn't of the mentality of
> >>>>>>> "being taken in."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The "officer" approached Pretti and started pushing him
> >>>>>> backward.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Pretti wasn't holding up his other up either.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When you reply to phoenix please take some time to edit.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll do as I please...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...just as you did when you wrote your reply to me.
> >>>
> >>> If you brazenly think he held up his up and such, people don't
> >>
> >> "Brazenly"?
> >>
> >>> respect your opinion about the resisting arrest either. You gonna
> >>> defend such syphilitic bullshit you don't know who you are talking
> >>> to. Just like your ad hoc crap spewed here, your opinion on the
> >>> arrest resisting is IRRELEVANT. You show zero discipline in your
> >>> observations.
> >>
> >> To resist arrest, someone first has to say "you are under arrest", doofus.
> >
> > Total nonsense.....
>
> I'm sorry, but that's a very clearly settled part of law.
Prove it.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
