XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: MeanDog@Snarl.Dash
On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:15:54 -0800, Alan wrote:
>On 2026-01-28 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 15:09:14 -0800, Alan wrote:
>>
>>> On 2026-01-28 15:05, phoenix wrote:
>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 2026-01-28 14:54, phoenix wrote:
>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2026-01-28 14:33, phoenix wrote:
>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-28 13:25, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:21:50 -0500, Governor Swill
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:36:19 +0000, Mitchell Holman
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.43e2accc5b842ea098ae63@usnews.blocknews.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10laqi3$3odrt$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> OFeem1987 @teleworm.us says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fascist's mask wrote this post by blinking in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Morse code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 9:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From your own cite:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "....must display the permit card and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identification document -----> upon lawful
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demand <---- by a peace officer"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When was Pretti ever asked for his permit?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Notwithstanding the dodge, I don't know, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never suggested that he was, and nor do I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> care. Doesn't matter with regard to the legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obligation to have the permit and ID on him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice dodge yerself!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> He didn't have it on him. Why not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ain't it grand seeing Second Amendment absolutists
>>>>>>>>>>>> complain that a gun control law wasn't being stictly
>>>>>>>>>>>> enforced?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Even more grand to watch them complain about
>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans violating their gun rights.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You have no gun rights when resisting arrest.
>>>>>>>>> How was he "resisting"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While I'm with the Democrats mostly on this subject, this is
>>>>>>>> not the strong point. He was resisting arrest by shoving his
>>>>>>>> camera in the guy's face. He wasn't of the mentality of
>>>>>>>> "being taken in."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The "officer" approached Pretti and started pushing him
>>>>>>> backward.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pretti wasn't holding up his other up either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When you reply to phoenix please take some time to edit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll do as I please...
>>>>>
>>>>> ...just as you did when you wrote your reply to me.
>>>>
>>>> If you brazenly think he held up his up and such, people don't
>>>
>>> "Brazenly"?
>>>
>>>> respect your opinion about the resisting arrest either. You gonna
>>>> defend such syphilitic bullshit you don't know who you are talking
>>>> to. Just like your ad hoc crap spewed here, your opinion on the
>>>> arrest resisting is IRRELEVANT. You show zero discipline in your
>>>> observations.
>>>
>>> To resist arrest, someone first has to say "you are under arrest", doofus.
>>
>> Total nonsense.....
>
>I'm sorry, but that's a very clearly settled part of law.
Only in your ignorant opinion...
--
Only losers want Socialism or Communism.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
