XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: invalid@none.com
In article <10lecqj$unrj$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
>
> On 2026-01-28 16:37, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <10le8rq$t7us$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-01-28 15:26, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 15:09:14 -0800, Alan wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2026-01-28 15:05, phoenix wrote:
> >>>>> Alan wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2026-01-28 14:54, phoenix wrote:
> >>>>>>> Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-28 14:33, phoenix wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-28 13:25, Socialism is for losers wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:21:50 -0500, Governor Swill
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:36:19 +0000, Mitchell Holman
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.43e2accc5b842ea098ae63@usnews.blocknews.net:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <10laqi3$3odrt$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OFeem1987 @teleworm.us says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fascist's mask wrote this post by blinking in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Morse code:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 9:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From your own cite:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "....must display the permit card and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identification document -----> upon lawful
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demand <---- by a peace officer"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When was Pretti ever asked for his permit?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Notwithstanding the dodge, I don't know, I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never suggested that he was, and nor do I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> care. Doesn't matter with regard to the legal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obligation to have the permit and ID on him.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice dodge yerself!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He didn't have it on him. Why not?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ain't it grand seeing Second Amendment absolutists
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> complain that a gun control law wasn't being stictly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> enforced?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Even more grand to watch them complain about
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans violating their gun rights.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You have no gun rights when resisting arrest.
> >>>>>>>>>> How was he "resisting"?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> While I'm with the Democrats mostly on this subject, this is
> >>>>>>>>> not the strong point. He was resisting arrest by shoving his
> >>>>>>>>> camera in the guy's face. He wasn't of the mentality of
> >>>>>>>>> "being taken in."
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The "officer" approached Pretti and started pushing him
> >>>>>>>> backward.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Pretti wasn't holding up his other up either.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> When you reply to phoenix please take some time to edit.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll do as I please...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...just as you did when you wrote your reply to me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you brazenly think he held up his up and such, people don't
> >>>>
> >>>> "Brazenly"?
> >>>>
> >>>>> respect your opinion about the resisting arrest either. You gonna
> >>>>> defend such syphilitic bullshit you don't know who you are talking
> >>>>> to. Just like your ad hoc crap spewed here, your opinion on the
> >>>>> arrest resisting is IRRELEVANT. You show zero discipline in your
> >>>>> observations.
> >>>>
> >>>> To resist arrest, someone first has to say "you are under arrest",
doofus.
> >>>
> >>> Total nonsense.....
> >>
> >> I'm sorry, but that's a very clearly settled part of law.
> >
> > Prove it.
>
> So if the officer doesn't tell you you are under arrest...
>
> ...how can you determine you are?
Oh you will know.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
