XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article ,   
   noemail@aol.com says...   
   >   
   > Socialism is for losers  wrote in   
   > news:4g3lnk9dheh0f9orspe1ajfqpeohnq1h0k@4ax.com:   
   >   
   > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:24:40 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >>On 2026-01-28 13:25, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   > >>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:21:50 -0500, Governor Swill   
   > >>>  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:36:19 +0000, Mitchell Holman   
   >    
   > >>>> wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> Skeeter  wrote in   
   > >>>>> news:MPG.43e2accc5b842ea098ae63@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> In article <10laqi3$3odrt$2@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987   
   > >>>>>> @teleworm.us says...   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> fascist's mask wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 9:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>    
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>       From your own cite:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> "....must display the permit card and identification   
   > >>>>>>>>> document -----> upon lawful demand <---- by a peace officer"   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> When was Pretti ever asked for his permit?   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Notwithstanding the dodge, I don't know, I never suggested that   
   > he   
   > >>>>>>>> was, and nor do I care. Doesn't matter with regard to the legal   
   > >>>>>>>> obligation to have the permit and ID on him.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> Nice dodge yerself!   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> He didn't have it on him. Why not?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>   Ain't it grand seeing Second Amendment   
   > >>>>> absolutists complain that a gun control   
   > >>>>> law wasn't being stictly enforced?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Even more grand to watch them complain about Republicans violating   
   > >>>> their gun rights.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> You have no gun rights when resisting arrest.   
   > >>How was he "resisting"?   
   > >   
   > > I don't know. I wasn't there.   
   >   
   >   
   >    So you cannot explain why someone needed   
   > to be shot 10 in the back as "self defense"   
      
   No proof of 10 shots.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)