XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: j63840576@gmail.com   
      
   Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article ,   
   > noemail@aol.com says...   
   >>   
   >> Socialism is for losers  wrote in   
   >> news:4g3lnk9dheh0f9orspe1ajfqpeohnq1h0k@4ax.com:   
   >>   
   >>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:24:40 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-28 13:25, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:21:50 -0500, Governor Swill   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:36:19 +0000, Mitchell Holman   
   >>    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Skeeter  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> news:MPG.43e2accc5b842ea098ae63@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> In article <10laqi3$3odrt$2@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987   
   >>>>>>>> @teleworm.us says...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> fascist's mask wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 9:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>        From your own cite:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> "....must display the permit card and identification   
   >>>>>>>>>>> document -----> upon lawful demand <---- by a peace officer"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> When was Pretti ever asked for his permit?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Notwithstanding the dodge, I don't know, I never suggested that   
   >> he   
   >>>>>>>>>> was, and nor do I care. Doesn't matter with regard to the legal   
   >>>>>>>>>> obligation to have the permit and ID on him.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Nice dodge yerself!   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> He didn't have it on him. Why not?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>    Ain't it grand seeing Second Amendment   
   >>>>>>> absolutists complain that a gun control   
   >>>>>>> law wasn't being stictly enforced?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Even more grand to watch them complain about Republicans violating   
   >>>>>> their gun rights.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You have no gun rights when resisting arrest.   
   >>>> How was he "resisting"?   
   >>>   
   >>> I don't know. I wasn't there.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>     So you cannot explain why someone needed   
   >> to be shot 10 in the back as "self defense"   
   >   
   > No proof of 10 shots.   
   >   
   The ICE agents showed exemplary control by firing 9 shots instead of 10.   
   --   
   xGytDsqkQY8   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)