XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: effingretard@fascist.org
On 1/30/26 3:00 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 10:43:30 -0500, fauci's mask
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/28/26 5:19 PM, Alan wrote:
>>> On 2026-01-26 07:59, fauci's mask wrote:
>>>> On 1/26/26 9:26 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> fauci's mask wrote in
>>>>> news:10l7qjq$2ho60$1@dont-
>>>>> email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/26/26 8:02 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>> Get shot in the back by Trump's thugs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He deserved it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For doing what?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For being the dumbest fuck in Minneapolis. No permit (required to
>>>> carry in MN);
>>>
>>> 1. He had a permit.
>>
>> Not on him as is required by MN law.
>
> Prove it.
Already did. I posted the law, which appears below.
> He was not asked for it.
He didn't need to be.
>>> 3. Even if he hadn't, they had no way to know that when they shot him.
>>
>> Irrelevant.
>
> Bullshit. If they didn't ask, they violated his rights.
I'm not arguing that point. All I'm saying is he's required to have the
permit and ID on him. He didn't. Thus, he broke the law.
>>>> no government ID (required to carry in MN);
>>>
>>> Cite that law please.
>>
>> Already done, but here it is again:
>> Minnesota Statutes Section 624.714, Subdivision 1b(a) The holder of a
>> permit to carry *MUST HAVE THE PERMIT CARD AND a driver's license, state
>> identification card, or other government-issued photo identification in
>> IMMEDIATE POSSESSION at all times when carrying a pistol*
>
> There is no evidence that he was ever asked for a permit. I haven't
> seen any video of him holding the gun. According to all reports on
> the subject, the gun was found holstered after he was shot.
Uh...okay. Again, he doesn't need to be asked for it. He's still
required to have it, and his ID, on him while in possession of a gun.
>
>> What did this supposed "interference" consist of?
>>
>> Nothing supposed about it. Video shows him face to face with an agent in
>> the street and being moved back to, or near, the sidewalk (would have
>> been fine if he stayed right there); but no, the dumbass then walks back
>> into the street, disregarding what the agent had him do, filming
>> interaction of agents with another couple other dumbasses. A woman gets
>> sauced and the dumbass goes to over to her, interfering with that
>> interaction.
>
> And that is a capital crime calling for summary execution?
Nope, never said it was.
>>>> aggressive demeanor - getting directly in the face of a Federal ICE
>>>> agent and pressing into the agent to the point that the agent put out
>>>> his hand to prevent Pretti from moving closer to the agent;
>>>
>>> Did he get closer to the agent...
>>
>> Yes, he did - when the agent pushed one of the other dumbasses he went
>> over to the agent and even put his hands on him to get him to back off.
>>
>>> ...or did the agent approach him?
>>
>> The first time the agent moved him off the street. After that the
>> dumbass approached the agents.
>
> So?
So, you asked.
>>>> did not comply. He did everything wrong that we are trained to do when
>>>> concealing.
>>>
>>> He wasn't given a chance to comply.
>>
>> He absolutely was, and he disregarded it.
>
> So?
So, you asked.
>>> He was being held down by multiple agents, and one of them had taken
>>> away the gun he never even reached for.
>>
>> Yes. . . . and?
>
> And AFTER restraining AND disarming him, they shot him to death
> anyway.
That's right. The question I have is when these agents are prosecuted,
will they be treated the same as Michael Byrd?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
