home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.politics      General politics chatter      94,851 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 94,104 of 94,851   
   fauci's mask to Mitchell Holman   
   Re: Good Guys With Guns   
   30 Jan 26 15:50:58   
   
   XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: effingretard@fascist.org   
      
   On 1/30/26 2:37 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   > fauci's mask  wrote in   
   > news:10lifhu$1haq8$3@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >> On 1/30/26 3:00 AM, Governor Swill wrote:   
   >>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 10:43:30 -0500, fauci's mask   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 1/28/26 5:19 PM, Alan wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2026-01-26 07:59, fauci's mask wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 1/26/26 9:26 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>>> fauci's mask  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> news:10l7qjq$2ho60$1@dont-   
   >>>>>>> email.me:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 8:02 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> Get shot in the back by Trump's thugs.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>         --bks   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> He deserved it.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>       For doing what?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> For being the dumbest fuck in Minneapolis. No permit (required to   
   >>>>>> carry in MN);   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> 1. He had a permit.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Not on him as is required by MN law.   
   >>>   
   >>> Prove it.   
   >>   
   >> Already did. I posted the law, which appears below.   
   >>   
   >>> He was not asked for it.   
   >>   
   >> He didn't need to be.   
   >>   
   >>>>> 3. Even if he hadn't, they had no way to know that when they shot   
   >>>>> him.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Irrelevant.   
   >>>   
   >>> Bullshit.  If they didn't ask, they violated his rights.   
   >>   
   >> I'm not arguing that point. All I'm saying is he's required to have   
   >> the permit and ID on him. He didn't. Thus, he broke the law.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>>>> no government ID (required to carry in MN);   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Cite that law please.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Already done, but here it is again:   
   >>>> Minnesota Statutes Section 624.714, Subdivision 1b(a) The holder of   
   >>>> a permit to carry *MUST HAVE THE PERMIT CARD AND a driver's license,   
   >>>> state identification card, or other government-issued photo   
   >>>> identification in IMMEDIATE POSSESSION at all times when carrying a   
   >>>> pistol*   
   >>>   
   >>> There is no evidence that he was ever asked for a permit.  I haven't   
   >>> seen any video of him holding the gun.  According to all reports on   
   >>> the subject, the gun was found holstered after he was shot.   
   >>   
   >> Uh...okay. Again, he doesn't need to be asked for it. He's still   
   >> required to have it, and his ID, on him while in possession of a gun.   
   >>   
   >>>    
   >>>> What did this supposed "interference" consist of?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Nothing supposed about it. Video shows him face to face with an   
   >>>> agent in the street and being moved back to, or near, the sidewalk   
   >>>> (would have been fine if he stayed right there); but no, the dumbass   
   >>>> then walks back into the street, disregarding what the agent had him   
   >>>> do, filming interaction of agents with another couple other   
   >>>> dumbasses. A woman gets sauced and the dumbass goes to over to her,   
   >>>> interfering with that interaction.   
   >>>   
   >>> And that is a capital crime calling for summary execution?   
   >>   
   >> Nope, never said it was.   
   >>   
   >>>>>> aggressive demeanor - getting directly in the face of a Federal   
   >>>>>> ICE agent and pressing into the agent to the point that the agent   
   >>>>>> put out his hand to prevent Pretti from moving closer to the   
   >>>>>> agent;   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Did he get closer to the agent...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yes, he did - when the agent pushed one of the other dumbasses he   
   >>>> went over to the agent and even put his hands on him to get him to   
   >>>> back off.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> ...or did the agent approach him?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The first time the agent moved him off the street. After that the   
   >>>> dumbass approached the agents.   
   >>>   
   >>> So?   
   >>   
   >> So, you asked.   
   >>   
   >>>>>> did not comply. He did everything wrong that we are trained to do   
   >>>>>> when concealing.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> He wasn't given a chance to comply.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> He absolutely was, and he disregarded it.   
   >>>   
   >>> So?   
   >>   
   >> So, you asked.   
   >>   
   >>>>> He was being held down by multiple agents, and one of them had   
   >>>>> taken away the gun he never even reached for.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yes. . . . and?   
   >>>   
   >>> And AFTER restraining AND disarming him, they shot him to death   
   >>> anyway.   
   >>   
   >> That's right. The question I have is when these agents are prosecuted,   
   >> will they be treated the same as Michael Byrd?   
   >   
   >   
   >     Who said these agents will be prosecuted?   
      
   Uh....I just did.   
      
   All you legal meatballs here are so certain they murdered Pretti that   
   this should be a slam dunk for Mary Moriarty and just a matter of time.   
   A blue prosecutor certainly can't let this injustice go unpunished, right?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca