XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: effingretard@fascist.org
On 1/30/26 4:22 PM, phoenix wrote:
> fauci's mask wrote:
>> On 1/30/26 2:37 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> fauci's mask wrote in
>>> news:10lifhu$1haq8$3@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On 1/30/26 3:00 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 10:43:30 -0500, fauci's mask
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/28/26 5:19 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2026-01-26 07:59, fauci's mask wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 9:26 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> fauci's mask wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:10l7qjq$2ho60$1@dont-
>>>>>>>>> email.me:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 8:02 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Get shot in the back by Trump's thugs.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He deserved it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For doing what?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For being the dumbest fuck in Minneapolis. No permit (required to
>>>>>>>> carry in MN);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. He had a permit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not on him as is required by MN law.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>
>>>> Already did. I posted the law, which appears below.
>>>>
>>>>> He was not asked for it.
>>>>
>>>> He didn't need to be.
>>>>
>>>>>>> 3. Even if he hadn't, they had no way to know that when they shot
>>>>>>> him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bullshit. If they didn't ask, they violated his rights.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not arguing that point. All I'm saying is he's required to have
>>>> the permit and ID on him. He didn't. Thus, he broke the law.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> no government ID (required to carry in MN);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cite that law please.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Already done, but here it is again:
>>>>>> Minnesota Statutes Section 624.714, Subdivision 1b(a) The holder of
>>>>>> a permit to carry *MUST HAVE THE PERMIT CARD AND a driver's license,
>>>>>> state identification card, or other government-issued photo
>>>>>> identification in IMMEDIATE POSSESSION at all times when carrying a
>>>>>> pistol*
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no evidence that he was ever asked for a permit. I haven't
>>>>> seen any video of him holding the gun. According to all reports on
>>>>> the subject, the gun was found holstered after he was shot.
>>>>
>>>> Uh...okay. Again, he doesn't need to be asked for it. He's still
>>>> required to have it, and his ID, on him while in possession of a gun.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> What did this supposed "interference" consist of?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing supposed about it. Video shows him face to face with an
>>>>>> agent in the street and being moved back to, or near, the sidewalk
>>>>>> (would have been fine if he stayed right there); but no, the dumbass
>>>>>> then walks back into the street, disregarding what the agent had him
>>>>>> do, filming interaction of agents with another couple other
>>>>>> dumbasses. A woman gets sauced and the dumbass goes to over to her,
>>>>>> interfering with that interaction.
>>>>>
>>>>> And that is a capital crime calling for summary execution?
>>>>
>>>> Nope, never said it was.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> aggressive demeanor - getting directly in the face of a Federal
>>>>>>>> ICE agent and pressing into the agent to the point that the agent
>>>>>>>> put out his hand to prevent Pretti from moving closer to the
>>>>>>>> agent;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did he get closer to the agent...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, he did - when the agent pushed one of the other dumbasses he
>>>>>> went over to the agent and even put his hands on him to get him to
>>>>>> back off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...or did the agent approach him?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first time the agent moved him off the street. After that the
>>>>>> dumbass approached the agents.
>>>>>
>>>>> So?
>>>>
>>>> So, you asked.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> did not comply. He did everything wrong that we are trained to do
>>>>>>>> when concealing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He wasn't given a chance to comply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He absolutely was, and he disregarded it.
>>>>>
>>>>> So?
>>>>
>>>> So, you asked.
>>>>
>>>>>>> He was being held down by multiple agents, and one of them had
>>>>>>> taken away the gun he never even reached for.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. . . . and?
>>>>>
>>>>> And AFTER restraining AND disarming him, they shot him to death
>>>>> anyway.
>>>>
>>>> That's right. The question I have is when these agents are prosecuted,
>>>> will they be treated the same as Michael Byrd?
>>>
>>>
>>> Who said these agents will be prosecuted?
>>
>> Uh....I just did.
>>
>> All you legal meatballs here are so certain they murdered Pretti that
>> this should be a slam dunk for Mary Moriarty and just a matter of
>> time. A blue prosecutor certainly can't let this injustice go
>> unpunished, right?
>
> Shit is razor thin. What sells me on prosecution is the video showing
> the two agents who escalated the situation.
I don't know what video you're watching, but it sure ain't Pretti's killing.
> However, I don't think Alex
> Pretti gave much thought to his own life.
It's almost like a suicide, isn't it? Which puts his utter lack of
judgment and history of aggressive behavior toward law enforcement
directly in the crosshairs.
> But isn't that what Kyle
> Rittenhouse was commended for?
Nah. Pretti: mouthy protestor, kicks taillights, acts aggressively
towards law enforcement. Rittenhouse: armed vigilante, shot two dead.
Reckless? I guess. Commendable hero? Only in one narrative.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
