XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: effingretard@fascist.org
On 1/30/26 9:49 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> fauci's mask wrote in
> news:10lj8a8$278jl$6@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 1/30/26 4:22 PM, phoenix wrote:
>>> fauci's mask wrote:
>>>> On 1/30/26 2:37 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> fauci's mask wrote in
>>>>> news:10lifhu$1haq8$3@dont-email.me:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/30/26 3:00 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 10:43:30 -0500, fauci's mask
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/28/26 5:19 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-26 07:59, fauci's mask wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 9:26 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> fauci's mask wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:10l7qjq$2ho60$1@dont-
>>>>>>>>>>> email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 8:02 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get shot in the back by Trump's thugs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He deserved it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For doing what?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For being the dumbest fuck in Minneapolis. No permit (required
>>>>>>>>>> to carry in MN);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. He had a permit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not on him as is required by MN law.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Already did. I posted the law, which appears below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He was not asked for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He didn't need to be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3. Even if he hadn't, they had no way to know that when they
>>>>>>>>> shot him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bullshit. If they didn't ask, they violated his rights.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not arguing that point. All I'm saying is he's required to
>>>>>> have the permit and ID on him. He didn't. Thus, he broke the law.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> no government ID (required to carry in MN);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cite that law please.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Already done, but here it is again:
>>>>>>>> Minnesota Statutes Section 624.714, Subdivision 1b(a) The holder
>>>>>>>> of a permit to carry *MUST HAVE THE PERMIT CARD AND a driver's
>>>>>>>> license, state identification card, or other government-issued
>>>>>>>> photo identification in IMMEDIATE POSSESSION at all times when
>>>>>>>> carrying a pistol*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no evidence that he was ever asked for a permit. I
>>>>>>> haven't seen any video of him holding the gun. According to all
>>>>>>> reports on the subject, the gun was found holstered after he was
>>>>>>> shot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh...okay. Again, he doesn't need to be asked for it. He's still
>>>>>> required to have it, and his ID, on him while in possession of a
>>>>>> gun.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What did this supposed "interference" consist of?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nothing supposed about it. Video shows him face to face with an
>>>>>>>> agent in the street and being moved back to, or near, the
>>>>>>>> sidewalk (would have been fine if he stayed right there); but
>>>>>>>> no, the dumbass then walks back into the street, disregarding
>>>>>>>> what the agent had him do, filming interaction of agents with
>>>>>>>> another couple other dumbasses. A woman gets sauced and the
>>>>>>>> dumbass goes to over to her, interfering with that interaction.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And that is a capital crime calling for summary execution?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope, never said it was.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> aggressive demeanor - getting directly in the face of a
>>>>>>>>>> Federal ICE agent and pressing into the agent to the point
>>>>>>>>>> that the agent put out his hand to prevent Pretti from moving
>>>>>>>>>> closer to the agent;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Did he get closer to the agent...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, he did - when the agent pushed one of the other dumbasses
>>>>>>>> he went over to the agent and even put his hands on him to get
>>>>>>>> him to back off.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...or did the agent approach him?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The first time the agent moved him off the street. After that
>>>>>>>> the dumbass approached the agents.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, you asked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> did not comply. He did everything wrong that we are trained to
>>>>>>>>>> do when concealing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He wasn't given a chance to comply.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He absolutely was, and he disregarded it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, you asked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He was being held down by multiple agents, and one of them had
>>>>>>>>> taken away the gun he never even reached for.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes. . . . and?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And AFTER restraining AND disarming him, they shot him to death
>>>>>>> anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's right. The question I have is when these agents are
>>>>>> prosecuted, will they be treated the same as Michael Byrd?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Who said these agents will be prosecuted?
>>>>
>>>> Uh....I just did.
>>>>
>>>> All you legal meatballs here are so certain they murdered Pretti
>>>> that this should be a slam dunk for Mary Moriarty and just a matter
>>>> of time. A blue prosecutor certainly can't let this injustice go
>>>> unpunished, right?
>>>
>>> Shit is razor thin. What sells me on prosecution is the video showing
>>> the two agents who escalated the situation.
>>
>> I don't know what video you're watching, but it sure ain't Pretti's
>> killing.
>>
>>> However, I don't think Alex
>>> Pretti gave much thought to his own life.
>>
>> It's almost like a suicide, isn't it? Which puts his utter lack of
>> judgment and history of aggressive behavior toward law enforcement
>> directly in the crosshairs.
>
>
> That would be a great defense at the
> agent who killed him's trial.
No it wouldn't.
> Except there isn't going to be a trial.
There will be. The MN AG or Minneapolis DA will not let it go.
> The Trump DOJ won't even investigate the
> case much less prosecuted it.
Sure they are.
> The verdict is already. It is legal to
> shoot people in the back as long as they are
> "aggressive to law enforcement"
That's not facts, that's a slogan.
>
>
>
>>
>>> But isn't that what Kyle
>>> Rittenhouse was commended for?
>>
>> Nah. Pretti: mouthy protestor, kicks taillights, acts aggressively
>> towards law enforcement.
>
>
> Law abiding gun owner.
Nope, didn't have his permit or ID on him. We're not going through this
again, are we?
>
>
>> Rittenhouse: armed vigilante, shot two dead.
>> Reckless? I guess. Commendable hero? Only in one narrative.
>
>
> Did he get shot for failing to have the
> proper gun permit on him?
Stupid question.
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
