XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: invalid@none.com
In article ,
noemail@aol.com says...
>
> fauci's mask wrote in
> news:10lj8a8$278jl$6@dont-email.me:
>
> > On 1/30/26 4:22 PM, phoenix wrote:
> >> fauci's mask wrote:
> >>> On 1/30/26 2:37 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>> fauci's mask wrote in
> >>>> news:10lifhu$1haq8$3@dont-email.me:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 1/30/26 3:00 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 10:43:30 -0500, fauci's mask
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 1/28/26 5:19 PM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-26 07:59, fauci's mask wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 9:26 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> fauci's mask wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>> news:10l7qjq$2ho60$1@dont-
> >>>>>>>>>> email.me:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 8:02 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Get shot in the back by Trump's thugs.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --bks
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> He deserved it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> For doing what?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> For being the dumbest fuck in Minneapolis. No permit (required
> >>>>>>>>> to carry in MN);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 1. He had a permit.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Not on him as is required by MN law.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Prove it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Already did. I posted the law, which appears below.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> He was not asked for it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> He didn't need to be.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 3. Even if he hadn't, they had no way to know that when they
> >>>>>>>> shot him.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Irrelevant.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Bullshit. If they didn't ask, they violated his rights.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm not arguing that point. All I'm saying is he's required to
> >>>>> have the permit and ID on him. He didn't. Thus, he broke the law.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> no government ID (required to carry in MN);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cite that law please.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Already done, but here it is again:
> >>>>>>> Minnesota Statutes Section 624.714, Subdivision 1b(a) The holder
> >>>>>>> of a permit to carry *MUST HAVE THE PERMIT CARD AND a driver's
> >>>>>>> license, state identification card, or other government-issued
> >>>>>>> photo identification in IMMEDIATE POSSESSION at all times when
> >>>>>>> carrying a pistol*
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There is no evidence that he was ever asked for a permit. I
> >>>>>> haven't seen any video of him holding the gun. According to all
> >>>>>> reports on the subject, the gun was found holstered after he was
> >>>>>> shot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Uh...okay. Again, he doesn't need to be asked for it. He's still
> >>>>> required to have it, and his ID, on him while in possession of a
> >>>>> gun.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What did this supposed "interference" consist of?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Nothing supposed about it. Video shows him face to face with an
> >>>>>>> agent in the street and being moved back to, or near, the
> >>>>>>> sidewalk (would have been fine if he stayed right there); but
> >>>>>>> no, the dumbass then walks back into the street, disregarding
> >>>>>>> what the agent had him do, filming interaction of agents with
> >>>>>>> another couple other dumbasses. A woman gets sauced and the
> >>>>>>> dumbass goes to over to her, interfering with that interaction.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And that is a capital crime calling for summary execution?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nope, never said it was.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> aggressive demeanor - getting directly in the face of a
> >>>>>>>>> Federal ICE agent and pressing into the agent to the point
> >>>>>>>>> that the agent put out his hand to prevent Pretti from moving
> >>>>>>>>> closer to the agent;
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Did he get closer to the agent...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes, he did - when the agent pushed one of the other dumbasses
> >>>>>>> he went over to the agent and even put his hands on him to get
> >>>>>>> him to back off.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...or did the agent approach him?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The first time the agent moved him off the street. After that
> >>>>>>> the dumbass approached the agents.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So, you asked.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> did not comply. He did everything wrong that we are trained to
> >>>>>>>>> do when concealing.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> He wasn't given a chance to comply.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> He absolutely was, and he disregarded it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So, you asked.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> He was being held down by multiple agents, and one of them had
> >>>>>>>> taken away the gun he never even reached for.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes. . . . and?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And AFTER restraining AND disarming him, they shot him to death
> >>>>>> anyway.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That's right. The question I have is when these agents are
> >>>>> prosecuted, will they be treated the same as Michael Byrd?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Who said these agents will be prosecuted?
> >>>
> >>> Uh....I just did.
> >>>
> >>> All you legal meatballs here are so certain they murdered Pretti
> >>> that this should be a slam dunk for Mary Moriarty and just a matter
> >>> of time. A blue prosecutor certainly can't let this injustice go
> >>> unpunished, right?
> >>
> >> Shit is razor thin. What sells me on prosecution is the video showing
> >> the two agents who escalated the situation.
> >
> > I don't know what video you're watching, but it sure ain't Pretti's
> > killing.
> >
> >> However, I don't think Alex
> >> Pretti gave much thought to his own life.
> >
> > It's almost like a suicide, isn't it? Which puts his utter lack of
> > judgment and history of aggressive behavior toward law enforcement
> > directly in the crosshairs.
>
>
> That would be a great defense at the
> agent who killed him's trial.
>
> Except there isn't going to be a trial.
>
> The Trump DOJ won't even investigate the
> case much less prosecuted it.
>
> The verdict is already. It is legal to
> shoot people in the back as long as they are
> "aggressive to law enforcement"
>
>
>
>
> >
> >> But isn't that what Kyle
> >> Rittenhouse was commended for?
> >
> > Nah. Pretti: mouthy protestor, kicks taillights, acts aggressively
> > towards law enforcement.
>
>
> Law abiding gun owner.
>
>
>
> > Rittenhouse: armed vigilante, shot two dead.
> > Reckless? I guess. Commendable hero? Only in one narrative.
>
>
> Did he get shot for failing to have the
> proper gun permit on him?
He did the shooting and the others FAFO.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
