XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: j63840576@gmail.com
Skeeter wrote:
> In article ,
> noemail@aol.com says...
>>
>> fauci's mask wrote in
>> news:10lj8a8$278jl$6@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On 1/30/26 4:22 PM, phoenix wrote:
>>>> fauci's mask wrote:
>>>>> On 1/30/26 2:37 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>> fauci's mask wrote in
>>>>>> news:10lifhu$1haq8$3@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/30/26 3:00 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 10:43:30 -0500, fauci's mask
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/26 5:19 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-26 07:59, fauci's mask wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 9:26 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> fauci's mask wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10l7qjq$2ho60$1@dont-
>>>>>>>>>>>> email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 8:02 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get shot in the back by Trump's thugs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> He deserved it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For doing what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For being the dumbest fuck in Minneapolis. No permit (required
>>>>>>>>>>> to carry in MN);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. He had a permit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not on him as is required by MN law.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Already did. I posted the law, which appears below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He was not asked for it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He didn't need to be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3. Even if he hadn't, they had no way to know that when they
>>>>>>>>>> shot him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bullshit. If they didn't ask, they violated his rights.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not arguing that point. All I'm saying is he's required to
>>>>>>> have the permit and ID on him. He didn't. Thus, he broke the law.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> no government ID (required to carry in MN);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cite that law please.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Already done, but here it is again:
>>>>>>>>> Minnesota Statutes Section 624.714, Subdivision 1b(a) The holder
>>>>>>>>> of a permit to carry *MUST HAVE THE PERMIT CARD AND a driver's
>>>>>>>>> license, state identification card, or other government-issued
>>>>>>>>> photo identification in IMMEDIATE POSSESSION at all times when
>>>>>>>>> carrying a pistol*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that he was ever asked for a permit. I
>>>>>>>> haven't seen any video of him holding the gun. According to all
>>>>>>>> reports on the subject, the gun was found holstered after he was
>>>>>>>> shot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Uh...okay. Again, he doesn't need to be asked for it. He's still
>>>>>>> required to have it, and his ID, on him while in possession of a
>>>>>>> gun.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What did this supposed "interference" consist of?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nothing supposed about it. Video shows him face to face with an
>>>>>>>>> agent in the street and being moved back to, or near, the
>>>>>>>>> sidewalk (would have been fine if he stayed right there); but
>>>>>>>>> no, the dumbass then walks back into the street, disregarding
>>>>>>>>> what the agent had him do, filming interaction of agents with
>>>>>>>>> another couple other dumbasses. A woman gets sauced and the
>>>>>>>>> dumbass goes to over to her, interfering with that interaction.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And that is a capital crime calling for summary execution?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, never said it was.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> aggressive demeanor - getting directly in the face of a
>>>>>>>>>>> Federal ICE agent and pressing into the agent to the point
>>>>>>>>>>> that the agent put out his hand to prevent Pretti from moving
>>>>>>>>>>> closer to the agent;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Did he get closer to the agent...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, he did - when the agent pushed one of the other dumbasses
>>>>>>>>> he went over to the agent and even put his hands on him to get
>>>>>>>>> him to back off.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...or did the agent approach him?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The first time the agent moved him off the street. After that
>>>>>>>>> the dumbass approached the agents.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, you asked.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> did not comply. He did everything wrong that we are trained to
>>>>>>>>>>> do when concealing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He wasn't given a chance to comply.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He absolutely was, and he disregarded it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, you asked.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He was being held down by multiple agents, and one of them had
>>>>>>>>>> taken away the gun he never even reached for.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes. . . . and?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And AFTER restraining AND disarming him, they shot him to death
>>>>>>>> anyway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's right. The question I have is when these agents are
>>>>>>> prosecuted, will they be treated the same as Michael Byrd?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who said these agents will be prosecuted?
>>>>>
>>>>> Uh....I just did.
>>>>>
>>>>> All you legal meatballs here are so certain they murdered Pretti
>>>>> that this should be a slam dunk for Mary Moriarty and just a matter
>>>>> of time. A blue prosecutor certainly can't let this injustice go
>>>>> unpunished, right?
>>>>
>>>> Shit is razor thin. What sells me on prosecution is the video showing
>>>> the two agents who escalated the situation.
>>>
>>> I don't know what video you're watching, but it sure ain't Pretti's
>>> killing.
>>>
>>>> However, I don't think Alex
>>>> Pretti gave much thought to his own life.
>>>
>>> It's almost like a suicide, isn't it? Which puts his utter lack of
>>> judgment and history of aggressive behavior toward law enforcement
>>> directly in the crosshairs.
>>
>>
>> That would be a great defense at the
>> agent who killed him's trial.
>>
>> Except there isn't going to be a trial.
>>
>> The Trump DOJ won't even investigate the
>> case much less prosecuted it.
>>
>> The verdict is already. It is legal to
>> shoot people in the back as long as they are
>> "aggressive to law enforcement"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> But isn't that what Kyle
>>>> Rittenhouse was commended for?
>>>
>>> Nah. Pretti: mouthy protestor, kicks taillights, acts aggressively
>>> towards law enforcement.
>>
>>
>> Law abiding gun owner.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Rittenhouse: armed vigilante, shot two dead.
>>> Reckless? I guess. Commendable hero? Only in one narrative.
>>
>>
>> Did he get shot for failing to have the
>> proper gun permit on him?
>
> He did the shooting and the others FAFO.
>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
