XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: effingretard@fascist.org
On 1/31/26 9:40 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> fauci's mask wrote in news:10ll2hc$278jl$8
> @dont-email.me:
>
>> On 1/30/26 9:49 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> fauci's mask wrote in
>>> news:10lj8a8$278jl$6@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On 1/30/26 4:22 PM, phoenix wrote:
>>>>> fauci's mask wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/30/26 2:37 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>> fauci's mask wrote in
>>>>>>> news:10lifhu$1haq8$3@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/30/26 3:00 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 10:43:30 -0500, fauci's mask
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/26 5:19 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-26 07:59, fauci's mask wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 9:26 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fauci's mask wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10l7qjq$2ho60$1@dont-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/26/26 8:02 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get shot in the back by Trump's thugs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --bks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He deserved it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For doing what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For being the dumbest fuck in Minneapolis. No permit
> (required
>>>>>>>>>>>> to carry in MN);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. He had a permit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not on him as is required by MN law.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Already did. I posted the law, which appears below.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He was not asked for it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He didn't need to be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Even if he hadn't, they had no way to know that when they
>>>>>>>>>>> shot him.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bullshit. If they didn't ask, they violated his rights.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not arguing that point. All I'm saying is he's required to
>>>>>>>> have the permit and ID on him. He didn't. Thus, he broke the law.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> no government ID (required to carry in MN);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cite that law please.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Already done, but here it is again:
>>>>>>>>>> Minnesota Statutes Section 624.714, Subdivision 1b(a) The
> holder
>>>>>>>>>> of a permit to carry *MUST HAVE THE PERMIT CARD AND a driver's
>>>>>>>>>> license, state identification card, or other government-issued
>>>>>>>>>> photo identification in IMMEDIATE POSSESSION at all times when
>>>>>>>>>> carrying a pistol*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that he was ever asked for a permit. I
>>>>>>>>> haven't seen any video of him holding the gun. According to
> all
>>>>>>>>> reports on the subject, the gun was found holstered after he was
>>>>>>>>> shot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Uh...okay. Again, he doesn't need to be asked for it. He's still
>>>>>>>> required to have it, and his ID, on him while in possession of a
>>>>>>>> gun.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What did this supposed "interference" consist of?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nothing supposed about it. Video shows him face to face with an
>>>>>>>>>> agent in the street and being moved back to, or near, the
>>>>>>>>>> sidewalk (would have been fine if he stayed right there); but
>>>>>>>>>> no, the dumbass then walks back into the street, disregarding
>>>>>>>>>> what the agent had him do, filming interaction of agents with
>>>>>>>>>> another couple other dumbasses. A woman gets sauced and the
>>>>>>>>>> dumbass goes to over to her, interfering with that interaction.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And that is a capital crime calling for summary execution?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope, never said it was.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> aggressive demeanor - getting directly in the face of a
>>>>>>>>>>>> Federal ICE agent and pressing into the agent to the point
>>>>>>>>>>>> that the agent put out his hand to prevent Pretti from moving
>>>>>>>>>>>> closer to the agent;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Did he get closer to the agent...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, he did - when the agent pushed one of the other dumbasses
>>>>>>>>>> he went over to the agent and even put his hands on him to get
>>>>>>>>>> him to back off.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ...or did the agent approach him?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The first time the agent moved him off the street. After that
>>>>>>>>>> the dumbass approached the agents.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, you asked.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> did not comply. He did everything wrong that we are trained
> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> do when concealing.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He wasn't given a chance to comply.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He absolutely was, and he disregarded it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, you asked.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He was being held down by multiple agents, and one of them had
>>>>>>>>>>> taken away the gun he never even reached for.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes. . . . and?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And AFTER restraining AND disarming him, they shot him to death
>>>>>>>>> anyway.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's right. The question I have is when these agents are
>>>>>>>> prosecuted, will they be treated the same as Michael Byrd?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who said these agents will be prosecuted?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh....I just did.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All you legal meatballs here are so certain they murdered Pretti
>>>>>> that this should be a slam dunk for Mary Moriarty and just a matter
>>>>>> of time. A blue prosecutor certainly can't let this injustice go
>>>>>> unpunished, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Shit is razor thin. What sells me on prosecution is the video
> showing
>>>>> the two agents who escalated the situation.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know what video you're watching, but it sure ain't Pretti's
>>>> killing.
>>>>
>>>>> However, I don't think Alex
>>>>> Pretti gave much thought to his own life.
>>>>
>>>> It's almost like a suicide, isn't it? Which puts his utter lack of
>>>> judgment and history of aggressive behavior toward law enforcement
>>>> directly in the crosshairs.
>>>
>>>
>>> That would be a great defense at the
>>> agent who killed him's trial.
>>
>> No it wouldn't.
>>
>>> Except there isn't going to be a trial.
>>
>> There will be. The MN AG or Minneapolis DA will not let it go.
>>
>>> The Trump DOJ won't even investigate the
>>> case much less prosecuted it.
>>
>> Sure they are.
>>
>>> The verdict is already. It is legal to
>>> shoot people in the back as long as they are
>>> "aggressive to law enforcement"
>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
