XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10mnkqs$2g3o9$1@dont-email.me>,   
   chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...   
   >   
   > Chris Ahlstrom wrote:   
   > > Meme them till they cry wrote this post by blinking in Morse code:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2/12/26 8:10 PM, pothead wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>    
   > >>   
   > >>> Which brings us to the Epstein files which the Biden   
   > >>> administration controlled for 4 years. Yet not a peep out of   
   > >>> them. they could have sunk Trump for good if they could   
   > >>> produce evidence of him playing with minors. But they didn't.   
   > >>> Why? Answer is they examined the files and quickly discovered   
   > >>> that democrats and democrat supporters are mentioned all over   
   > >>> the documentation.   
   > >   
   > > So why didn't Trump, who reportedly knew about it and told law   
   > > enforcement about it, in his *first* term, order up the Epstein   
   > > files? He also had control of it for *4* years.   
   > >   
   > > And why is Trump *not* *vociferously* ordering Bondi and Patel to   
   > > air them out with *only* the victims names redacted, and why does   
   > > he say it is no big deal?   
   > >   
   > > One surmises that Trump *was* part of the cabal of wealthy   
   > > figures, both Democrat and Republican, who fell for what seems to   
   > > be a KGB-supported honeypot.   
   > >   
   > > Or perhaps he's *afraid* that some wealthy Epstein associate might   
   > > do to him what happened to Epstein.   
   > >   
   > > What a tangled web is weaved.   
   > >   
   >   
   > Why should Biden who had nothing to do with Epstein realise what a mess   
   > it is? Why does the fat fuck who knew Epstein work so hard to cover it up?   
      
   How do you know Biden didn't have anything to do with   
   Epstein? Why didn't he release them?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|