XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, nz.politics
From: MeanDog@Snarl.Dash
On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 08:11:29 -0600, super70s
wrote:
>On 2026-01-08 13:00:12 +0000, -hh said:
>
>> On 1/8/26 05:25, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 05:22:28 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence DŽOliveiro
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 13:32:48 -0600, Ken wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No mention of the fact that the dead person was trying to run over
>>>>> ICE agents??
>>>>
>>>> Notice the shot was from an oblique angle. That (as well as the video
>>>> itself) shows the shooter was not in the path of the vehicle.
>>>
>>> Yet he clealy got hit.
>>
>> Where does the TTP state that an officer should deliberately stand in
>> front of an operating vehicle? Chapter & verse with cite, please.
>>
>> Putting yourself in harm's way when the TTP doesn't call for that
>> doctrine is a standards violation...
>>
>> ...and escalation to try to cover for your mistake isn't justified.
>>
>>
>> -hh
>
>They're notorious for standing by the front quarter panel of a car, out
>of harm's way but close enough to claim they were "in fear of their
>lives" if they shoot someone. This is not the first time an incident
>like this has happened with them.
She hit him and she got what she deserved.
--
Only losers want Socialism or Communism.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
