XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, nz.politics   
   From: super70s@super70s.invalid   
      
   On 2026-01-08 22:57:29 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:   
      
   > On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 16:25:57 -0600, super70s   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2026-01-08 21:09:46 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:   
   >>   
   >>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 14:50:00 -0600, super70s   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2026-01-08 20:46:10 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:22:19 -0500, -hh   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 1/8/26 11:49, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 08:11:29 -0600, super70s   
   >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2026-01-08 13:00:12 +0000, -hh said:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 1/8/26 05:25, Socialism is for losers wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 05:22:28 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D´Oliveiro   
   >>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 13:32:48 -0600, Ken wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> No mention of the fact that the dead person was trying to run over   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ICE agents??   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Notice the shot was from an oblique angle. That (as well as the   
   video   
   >>>>>>>>>>> itself) shows the shooter was not in the path of the vehicle.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Yet he clealy got hit.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Where does the TTP state that an officer should deliberately stand in   
   >>>>>>>>> front of an operating vehicle?  Chapter & verse with cite, please.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Putting yourself in harm's way when the TTP doesn't call for that   
   >>>>>>>>> doctrine is a standards violation...   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> ...and escalation to try to cover for your mistake isn't justified.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> -hh   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> They're notorious for standing by the front quarter panel of a car,   
   out   
   >>>>>>>> of harm's way but close enough to claim they were "in fear of their   
   >>>>>>>> lives" if they shoot someone. This is not the first time an incident   
   >>>>>>>> like this has happened with them.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> She hit him and she got what she deserved.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Barely, and that was despite how he deliberately stepped in front of a   
   >>>>>> running vehicle.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> FWIW, Adam Cochran has said that he's spoken on background with two   
   >>>>>> attorneys who have defended officer involved shootings.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Both have always taken their cases to trial.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> After reviewing the events today, both said if it were their client   
   >>>>>> they’d advise:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> - Seek a plea deal   
   >>>>>> - Be willing to plead guilty to a lesser crime or a lower sentence   
   >>>>>> - Accept anything that isn’t de jure LWOP (life with out parole)   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> In other words, the guys who defend police officers shooting for a   
   >>>>>> living, think this case is unwinnable.  They would try to defend his   
   >>>>>> actions, they’d just try and lower the impact of the outcome.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Their main sticking point were:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> - "I could argue shot number one and hope for an acquittal or a hung   
   >>>>>> jury - but I can’t get there on shots 2 and 3"   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> - "A jury will not get passed the turning of the wheels"   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> - "Denying medics throws self defense out the window"   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> -hh   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It will depend on the jury.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yeah a Minneapolis jury, not one in Alabammy. Good luck.   
   >>>   
   >>> No...  Federal agents are immune from state and local prosecution when   
   >>> acting on official business.   
   >>   
   >> You were the one who brought up a jury dweeb.   
   >   
   > Yeah...  do you have a point?   
      
   ?   
      
   You say: "It will depend on the jury."   
      
   I say: "Yeah a Minneapolis jury, not one in Alabammy. Good luck."   
      
   You say: "No... Federal agents are immune from state and local   
   prosecution when acting on official business."   
      
   Is your brain engaging before you hit the "Send" button?   
      
   >> This guy's gonna get his ass sued off in a civil suit at the very   
   >> least, cost him a lot more than his $50K sign-on bonus.   
   >   
   > It vould happen, but not likely.   
      
   Why isn't it likely. As O.J. Simpson found out the bar is quite lower   
   in a civil case than a criminal one.   
      
   >  If it does, he'd have lots of money   
   > coming in.   
      
   And so will her partner to pursue him legally until he dies.   
      
   >> Also get doxxed sooner or later, AI will see to that.   
   >   
   > He may have to shoot someone else.   
      
   For another unjustifiable homicide, he's chomping at the bit no doubt.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)