XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10k995q$8eb4$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-14 15:33, Aster Iske wrote:   
   > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:44:39 -0800   
   > > Alan  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> 7. Authorized Officers/Agents shall not discharge their firearms at   
   > >> the operator of a moving vehicle, vessel, or aircraft unless deadly   
   > >> force is necessary, that is, when the officer/agent has a reasonable   
   > >> belief that the operator poses an imminent danger of serious bodily   
   > >> injury or death to the officer/agent or to another person.   
   > >>   
   > >> a. Such deadly force may include a moving vehicle aimed at   
   > >> officers/agents or others present   
   > >   
   > > That covers it.   
   > >   
   > > Only traitors interfere with federal enforcement agents doing their job.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > "Imminent Threat Exception: The only exception where a federal agent can   
   > > use deadly force, which could include shooting at or using a vehicle to   
   > > stop another, is when the agent has a reasonable belief that the   
   > > escaping vehicle or its occupants pose an imminent threat of death or   
   > > serious physical injury to the officers or others, and no other   
   > > reasonable means of defense or escape exist. In this specific scenario,   
   > > the vehicle itself can be considered a deadly weapon."   
   > >   
   >   
   > The "escaping vehicle" posed NO THREAT AT ALL.   
      
   It was sideways on the road. Stop being stupid.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)