XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10k9gfh$dphk$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-14 15:30, Aster Iske wrote:   
   > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:36:44 -0800   
   > > Alan  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >>> Did you know that Minnesota law supports the agent's reaction?   
   > >>   
   > >> Did you know that the US Customs and Border Protection "Use of Force   
   > >> Policy" doesn't?   
   > >   
   > > Only traitors interfere with federal enforcement agents doing their job.   
   >   
   > Then Trump pardoned traitors...   
   >   
   > ...the ones who invaded the Capitol Building...   
   >   
   > ...and definitely DID attack federal enforcement agents just doing their   
   > job.   
      
   Like the one that murdered Ashley?   
   >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > "Imminent Threat Exception: The only exception where a federal agent can   
   > > use deadly force, which could include shooting at or using a vehicle to   
   > > stop another, is when the agent has a reasonable belief that the   
   > > escaping vehicle or its occupants pose an imminent threat of death or   
   > > serious physical injury to the officers or others, and no other   
   > > reasonable means of defense or escape exist. In this specific scenario,   
   > > the vehicle itself can be considered a deadly weapon."   
   > >   
   >   
   > "and no other reasonable means of defense or escape exist."   
   >   
   > One step to the right.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)