XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article ,   
   noemail@aol.com says...   
   >   
   > Skeeter  wrote in   
   > news:MPG.43d1df313a3f71e98ab02@usnews.blocknews.net:   
   >   
   > > In article <10k96l8$8549$14@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >> >   
   > >> > On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:16:44 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >> >   
   > >> >>> Both criminals.   
   > >> >   
   > >> >> You aren't allowed to shoot at someone when they aren't a threat.   
   > >> >   
   > >> > Correct... I guess.   
   > >> >   
   > >> > But, no. (see bottom)   
   > >> >   
   > >> >> Even if his first shot was when he was near the front of the   
   > >> >> vehicle, his next two were from directly beside the driver's door,   
   > >> >> and it was turning AWAY from him.   
   > >> >   
   > >> > And I've explained this, moron.   
   > >> >   
   > >> > Law enforcement, after having been run over, plowed down, assaulted   
   > >> > with a deadly weapon, vehicularly (Y, IK) assaulted, or any other   
   > >> > term you might want to use   
   > >> > here, usually shoot until the perpetrator is incapacitated or out   
   > >> > of range, to keep the driver from doing any more harm to others or   
   > >> > even themselves.   
   > >>   
   > >> Except this officer was not "run over" OR "plowed down".   
   > >   
   > > But he was hit.   
   > >>   
   > >> >   
   > >> > A threat is not "over" just because the vehicle has cleared the   
   > >> > officer's path.   
   > >>   
   > >> Yes, actually it is.   
   > >   
   > > Who says? You?  LOL   
   > >>   
   > >> >   
   > >> > If Good has already demonstrated her intent (which the officers did   
   > >> > not KNOW) to use a vehicle as a weapon, they remain a 'deadly   
   > >> > threat" until they are stopped. Turning "away" could simply be a   
   > >> > maneuver to reposition for another strike or to flee at high   
   > >> > speeds, endangering the public.   
   > >>   
   > >> Her obvious intent was to leave the area and an officer with no   
   > >> authority grabbed at her door, escalating the situation.   
   > >   
   > > No authority? He's a law officer you moron.   
   >   
   >   
   >    So were the Capitol Police that   
   > Trump (and you) want to prosecute.   
      
   Like the one that murdered Ashley?   
   >   
   >    And your point it?   
      
   point it?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)