XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics   
   From: NoBody@nowhere.com   
      
   On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:44:39 -0800, Alan  wrote:   
      
   >On 2026-01-12 09:39, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>   
   >> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:17:28 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>   
   >>>> IDENTIFICATION, maybe?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> https://i.imgur.com/DcWxMed.jpg   
   >>>> https://i.imgur.com/aG2QU6c.jpg   
   >>>   
   >>> He didn't have a bodycam?   
   >>   
   >> Hmmm... I do not know.   
   >>   
   >> Did YOU see a body cam?   
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> ...if he thought this person was a threat?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Who said that?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> WHO said what the agent "thought"?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Back into the mind-reading business, are we?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> PAAAAALONK!   
   >>   
   >>> Training.   
   >>   
   >> LOL... yours or his?   
   >>   
   >> Yours: tell us of this training. Tell us what YOUR training was when you   
   were   
   >> about to be run over by a domestic insurrectionist terrorist, who was   
   blocking   
   >> a federal agent, you, from performing your duty as an ICE agent.   
   >   
   >How was her leaving "blocking" him?   
      
   Why did you dodge his question.  It's a very straightforward one.   
      
   >   
   >>   
   >> His: tell us of his training. Tell us what HIS training was when he was   
   about   
   >> to be run over by a domestic insurrectionist terrorist, who was blocking him   
   >> and his fellow federal agents, from performing his/their duties as ICE   
   agents.   
   >   
   >I thought you'd never ask!   
   >   
   >'Chapter 1: General Guidelines   
   >   
   >C. Use of Safe Tactics   
   >   
   >2. Except where otherwise required by inspections or other operations,   
   >Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid standing directly in front of or   
   >behind a subject vehicle. Officers/agents should not place themselves in   
   >the path of a moving vehicle or use their body to block a vehicle’s path.   
      
   Pulling this out again I see.  He was not "in front" until she   
   reversed her vehicle and changed her angle.   
      
   Good grief.   
      
   >   
   >3. Authorized Officers/Agents should avoid intentionally and   
   >unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they have no   
   >alternative to using deadly force.'   
      
   He did.  SHE changed that equation.   
      
   >   
   >'Chapter 2: Use of Deadly Force   
   >   
   >A. General Guidelines and Responsibilities   
   >   
   >7. Authorized Officers/Agents shall not discharge their firearms at the   
   >operator of a moving vehicle, vessel, or aircraft unless deadly force is   
   >necessary, that is, when the officer/agent has a reasonable belief that   
   >the operator poses an imminent danger of serious bodily injury or death   
   >to the officer/agent or to another person.   
      
   Shooting to avoid being killed by van  seems pretty "necessary" to me.   
   Perhaps you should take the time to actually understand the   
   regulations you post?   
      
   >   
   >a. Such deadly force may include a moving vehicle aimed at   
   >officers/agents or others present, but would not include a moving   
   >vehicle merely fleeing from officers/agents unless the vehicle or the   
   >escape of the subject poses an imminent threat of serious bodily injury   
   >or death to the officer/agent or to another person.'   
      
   She had not yet fled when she hit him with the FRONT of her van.  Are   
   agents hired to be mind readers too?   
      
   Most liberals have had the good sense to realize that this line is   
   complete garbage and have wandered away.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)