XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics
From: nuh-uh@nope.com
On 2026-01-14 21:55, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <10k9evg$8eb4$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> says...
>>
>> On 2026-01-14 16:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <10k96on$8549$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-01-13 04:29, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:36:06 -0800, Alan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2026-01-12 04:10, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 13:16:20 -0800, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2026-01-11 05:31, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 00:17:51 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You only see the videos the MSM wants you to see.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Show one that shows anything different.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He shot through the driver's side window.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Show us the bullet hole.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Never mind... you'll just end up looking stupid.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/22MiNCw.jpg
>>>>>>>> Even if that bullet hole is real:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So now you're implying the photos (shown by all the mainstream media)
>>>>>>> is faked. You're pathetic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. It doesn't prove he was in the vehicle's PATH when he shot it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did you fail geometry in school?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, but apparently you did.
>>>>>
>>>>> Explain how the could get a straight shot into the windshield if he
>>>>> did not have a perpendicular angle to the vehicle.
>>>>
>>>> How do you know it was a "straight shot".
>>>>
>>>> You can shoot into the windshield of a vehicle from any position that is
>>>> in front of the plane of that windshield.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2. It doesn't justify that at least two more shots that clearly
happened
>>>>>>>> with he was directly beside the driver's door.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Law enforcement is taught to continue to continue firing until it is
>>>>>>> certain the threat is eliminated. It took less than a second to fire
>>>>>>> the shots.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BOOM!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh look, it took you too long to respond Alan. You're dead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What "threat" is there in a vehicle that is driving away from you?
>>>>>
>>>>> If it drove away from him how did it hit him with the FRONT left
>>>>> headlight? The footage is all available now and is clear as day. Your
>>>>> narrative is false.
>>>>
>>>> Did it hit him? I haven't seen any video that proves that there was even
>>>> light contact made.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Law enforcement is also taught not to position themselves in front of a
>>>>>> vehicle.
>>>>>
>>>>> He wasn't "in front" until she backed up and changed the angle such
>>>>> that he was.
>>>>
>>>> He was moving to put himself in that position, yes.
>>>
>>> You really have no clue do you?
>>
>> Far more than you.
>>
>>
>>
>> Where is the contact? You certainly can't see any in the video.
>>
>> The car starts to move when he is directly in front of its left
>> headlight and a single small step to HIS right would mean he wouldn't
>> have been in any danger even if the car was to move straight ahead...
>>
>> ...which we know it didn't do.
>>
>> Are you aware that the CBP's "Use of Force Policy" directs that officers
>> shouldn't place themselves in front of a vehicle in the first place?
>
> Plenty of videos say you're wrong.
Wrong about what?
How would "videos" make me wrong about the CBP "Use of Force Policy" and
what it says?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
