XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-15 15:08, Skeeter wrote:   
   > In article <10kbpr2$15km4$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > uh@nope.com says...   
   >>   
   >> On 2026-01-15 13:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   >>> In article <10kbi85$122uj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have   
   >>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> and she would still be alive if shw just would have   
   >>> followed orders.   
   >>   
   >> What "order" was she given?   
   >   
   > Get out of the car.   
      
   Show a video where that is heard.   
      
   >>   
   >> I've watched the videos: there was not order given to her.   
   >   
   > There was. Why did you ignore the video of her "wife"   
   > taunting the agents?   
   How is it relevant?   
      
   "Taunting" is most definitely free speech.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)