XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kbrvg$15km6$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-12 21:38, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >   
   > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:55:28 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-12 10:22, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:47:59 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>> Alan has run away.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> No. He hasn't and you know you're lying about it...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> ...because by the time you made this post (the one to which I'm   
   > >>>> replying), you'd already replied directly to me in another post   
   > >>>   
   > >>> "Running away" implies more than not replying, moron.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> You haven't proven a fucking thing, whereas everyone else has.   
   > >   
   > >> You haven't proven a thing, Loser.   
   > >   
   > > MOST people would list their proof, having taken the time to reply with   
   THAT   
   > > pansy-ass reply.   
   > >   
   > > But then again... MOST people aren't gay as fuck, so you CAN'T be included   
   in   
   > > "the most" crowd.   
   > >   
   > > Oh, and I HAVE proven my points. All your points are mind-reading bullshit.   
   > > You do NOT know what the agent was thinking, WHY he didn't use a body-cam,   
   > > that he might not have had, WHY was he videoing the car and the one   
   breaking   
   > > the law, and WHY he shot her.   
   >   
   > And you don't know what Good was thinking...   
   >   
   > ...but  you make up fantasies that she had to be shot because her intent   
   > might have been to "veer" onto the sidewalk.   
   >   
   > >   
   > > All my points are FACTUAL... yours are your pwecious wittle feewings that   
   your   
   > > shit parents instilled in you, that that's all that counts.   
   > Your points about how long she was there, what her motivations were,   
   > what she was trying to do when she was moving forward...   
   >   
   > ...those are all pure speculation by you.   
      
   Neither do you so so stop acting like you do.   
   >   
   > What is not speculation is that the "officer" could have avoided even   
   > the possibility of contact by taking one step to his right.   
      
   You defend anyone who is for your far left agenda.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)