XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kbshd$15km4$17@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-15 15:07, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kbq1g$15km4$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-14 22:52, AlleyCat wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:17:28 -0800,  Alan says...   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>> I wasn't open. She intentionally blocked. She then went   
   > >>>>> into a telephone pole and not down the road.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Open in the sense that there was no other person in the road down which   
   > >>>> she would have been driving.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Road?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> https://i.imgur.com/OC9smu9.mp4   
   > >>>   
   > >>> https://i.imgur.com/Lfbiqwg.jpeg   
   > >>>   
   > >>> See those people standing thar, stoopit? WHAT are they standing on?   
   > >>   
   > >> Were any of those people in the direction she intended to travel?   
   > >   
   > > She was pointed towards the curb. Why?   
   >   
   > Because she was in the middle of a three-point turn.   
      
   You said she was making a U Turn. Why couldn't she just   
   keep driving instead of doing that?   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> No.   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> YOU, in your infinite stupidity, do NOT know, that Good was not going to   
   go   
   > >>> down and veer off onto a sidewalk.   
   > >>   
   > >> Why would she do that?   
   > >   
   > > She wouldn't. Until she got blasted.   
   >   
   > Exactly. So the previous poster's position that the agent had to shoot   
   > to PREVENT her from doing so is complete bullshit   
      
   No one said that. He shot because she was trying to harm   
   him.   
   >   
   > Thank you!   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> Your argument is about to be circular.   
   > >   
   > > Only in your little world.   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Do you!?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Nope.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Law Enforcement always have innocent citizens in mind when dealing with   
   > >>> whacked-out criminals like Good.   
   > >> She was a citizen attempting to turn around and depart the area.   
   > >   
   > > You read minds now? Why did you ignore the video of her   
   > > "wife" running around the car and taunting the agents?   
   >   
   > What about it?   
      
   You ignore it. There was a lot more going on than her   
   trying to turn around.   
   >   
   > You don't know why she got out of the car.   
      
   She made that pretty obvious.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> Do you assume that every citizen might "veer off onto a sidewalk", and   
   > >> is that not, therefore, justification to shoot everyone who is behind   
   > >> the wheel of a car?   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Now you are spinning to avoid. That was a stupid   
   > > statement.   
   > The stupid statement was that the "agent" was justified in continuing to   
   > shoot because she MIGHT have been going to do those things...   
   >   
   > ...and that was Loser (AlleyCat)...   
   >   
   > ...not me.   
      
   She FAFO, that's all that matters.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)