XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics   
   From: invalid@none.com   
      
   In article <10kbs60$15km6$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   uh@nope.com says...   
   >   
   > On 2026-01-15 15:08, Skeeter wrote:   
   > > In article <10kbpr2$15km4$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > > uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>   
   > >> On 2026-01-15 13:12, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >>> In article <10kbi85$122uj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-   
   > >>> uh@nope.com says...   
   > >>>> He chose to remain there when a single step to his right would have   
   > >>>> taken him out of the danger area.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> and she would still be alive if shw just would have   
   > >>> followed orders.   
   > >>   
   > >> What "order" was she given?   
   > >   
   > > Get out of the car.   
   >   
   > Show a video where that is heard.   
   >   
   > >>   
   > >> I've watched the videos: there was not order given to her.   
   > >   
   > > There was. Why did you ignore the video of her "wife"   
   > > taunting the agents?   
   > How is it relevant?   
   >   
   > "Taunting" is most definitely free speech.   
      
   You ignored that. You ignored that she was running around   
   the car doing it while the other bitch was making a   
   "turn"?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)