XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, rec.arts   
   From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2026-01-28 18:02, pothead wrote:   
   > On 2026-01-29, Ubiquitous  wrote:   
   >> super70s@super70s.invalid wrote:   
   >>> Mitchell Holman  wrote:   
   >>>> BTR1701  wrote in news:10ldl1i$n46s$2@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>> "Mad Dog"  wrote:   
   >>>>>> Irish Star   
   >>   
   >>>>>> Melania Trump suffers huge blow as critics admit they thought her   
   >>>>>> documentary was a joke   
   >>>>>> Story by Kathleen O'Boyle   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> As First Lady Melania Trump continues promotional work for her   
   >>>>>> upcoming documentary Melania, critics online have reacted sharply to   
   >>>>>> the project's trailer, with viewers saying they 'thought it was a   
   >>>>>> joke. '   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The documentary, produced in part by Melania and directed by Brett   
   >>>>>> Ratner, is set for a worldwide theatrical release on January 30,   
   >>>>>> 2026, and will be followed by streaming availability on Amazon Prime   
   >>>>>> Video.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Melania attempts to provide audiences with a behind-the-scenes look   
   >>>>>> at the 20 days leading up to President Donald Trump's second   
   >>>>>> inauguration, with footage that includes Melania engaging in   
   >>>>>> activities ranging from travel to meetings and personal moments.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> As the trailer circulated on social media platforms, viewers slammed   
   >>>>>> Melania for her work on the documentary. On X, one commenter wrote,   
   >>>>>> "I thought this was a joke post."   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Another user posted, "get the f╉ out of here maam. " "Nobody   
   >>>>>> cares! " someone else wrote, with another adding, "Ain't no one going   
   >>>>>> the first time to your home video let alone going again. "   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Someone else's comment simply said, "I'd rather watch paint dry, "   
   >>>>>> with another adding, "Please girl, nobody is interested. "   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It's hilarious how news articles these days quote random replies on   
   >>>>> social media as if they're in any way significant or meaningful.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> "One commenter wrote..."   
   >>>>> "Another user posted..."   
   >>>>> "Someone else said..."   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> These people don't even have names, there's no indication of who they   
   >>>>> are, what expertise they have with regard to critiquing film, what   
   >>>>> they do for a living, etc. Just "someone said..." Why should I as the   
   >>>>> reader of the article give a tin shit what any of these people said or   
   >>>>> how they feel?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And now we have a whole government based   
   >>>> on this. Haitians eating dogs? "Heard that   
   >>>> from various sources". Greenlanders want the   
   >>>> US to invade? "Their stories are all over   
   >>>> the internet". Norwegians want a Nobel Prize   
   >>>> for Trump? "I have seen the social media posts,   
   >>>> they all want to honor me"   
   >>>   
   >>> Trump will probably buy several thousand ghost tickets like a lot of   
   >>> rightwing book authors so it will look like a big success.   
   >>   
   >> Well, there you go accusing others of what leftists routine do again!   
   >   
   > Indeed.   
   > The leftists are well known for projection.   
   >   
   > They've been flooding the Trump rally ticket lines reserving seats when they   
   have   
   > no intention of showing up and then make sure to point out all of the empty   
   seats.   
   >   
   > They fool nobody.   
   The really sad thing is that you probably believe that.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)