Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.trump    |    The politics of badass Donald Trump    |    145,682 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 144,678 of 145,682    |
|    AlleyCat to All    |
|    Re: Four Minutes, Faggot    |
|    29 Jan 26 18:42:40    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics       From: katt@gmail.com              On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 19:12:40 -0800, Alan says...              > > Prove it wrong.       >       > Why is it you never have to prove the claims you make?              Why is it you never have to prove the claims I make are false?              We all know why... because you can't. THAT'S why you wanna play your stupid       fucking faggot games... so you can argue other points that are NOT the topic.              This is what Ski Bunny always does, since he has such low self-esteem and       needs to make himself feel superior to all those who can actually make him       feel worse, because they can prove him wrong at every one of his "turns".              Back to your sea-lioning ways, huh? Sorry... fuck off. You can look up       everything I say or post. I'm not going to be a part of your power-tripping.              Sealioning is a specific type of trolling where someone pretends to be polite       and "just seeking the truth," but THEY INTENTIONALLY IGNORE THE EVIDENCE       you've already given. They keep DEMANDING MORE PROOF (LOL) or OBSESSING OVER       TINY MINUTIAE to exhaust you, even though you both know they've seen the       facts. This often involves "Gatekeeping" by acting as the sole judge of what       counts as "valid proof," they maintain a position of authority and treat the       "truth" as a members-only club.              This is what you'll do once I give you my source:              You'll grind down a solid argument into tiny, IRRELEVANT GRAINS (minutiae).       You'll refuse to acknowledge the evidence because you're too busy looking at a       single grain of sand under a magnifying glass.              Then, when I resist giving you my source(s), you'll go back to your argumentum       ad Nauseam. That's another of your tactics: REPEATING AN ARGUMENT OR A DENIAL       OVER AND OVER AGAIN-ignoring all corrections and evidence-until one of us gets       tired and stops talking. At that point, you'll claims "victory".              You aren't "looking for the truth"... ; you're looking to win the argument by       any means necessary. This is your Duper's Delight in action; your being a       sophist and it makes you feel superior, because you know you're lying, but       you're still trying to argue in good faith.              Fail!              Your inability to use a search engine is not of my concern.              PLONK!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca