Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.trump    |    The politics of badass Donald Trump    |    145,682 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 144,835 of 145,682    |
|    NoBody to All    |
|    Re: [Way OT] Doppelgangers    |
|    07 Feb 26 22:55:09    |
      XPost: aus.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       From: NoBody@nowhere.com              'Melania' Is One Of The Five Worst-Reviewed Movies In IMDB History              ByPaul Tassi,              It was a wild weekend at the box office, with Sam Raimi's return to horror,       Send Help, just edging out a YouTuber's horror debut, Iron Lung, then in       third place, a controversial, self-title Melania Trump documentary. Melania       was projected to earn only $3-5 million, but with a $7 million haul, it's       one of the most successful documentaries in years. Amazon, however, paid       $40 million to acquire it and $35 million to market it to "success" is a       bit of a sliding scale. in context.              In terms of how it's been received, it's at two hyper-extreme ends of the       spectrum. Over on Rotten Tomatoes, critics have given it a 10% score, while       the audience? A 99% score. Melania has a conversely stunning 7/100 critic       score on Metacritic, with a 1.3/10 user score. Then, on the biggest movie       site, IMDB, user scores give it a 1.3 out of 10, which puts it in the       bottom five reviewed movies of all time on IMDB, out of hundreds of       thousands (730,00 movies by last count). Here is the bottom ten:              Daniel The Wizard – 1.2       Smolensk – 1.2       Melania – 1.3       Foodfight! – 1.3       Kirk Cameron's Saving Christmas – 1.3       Superbabies: Baby Geniuses 2 – 1.5       Turks in Space – 1.5       The Cost of Deception – 1.5       Birdemic – Shock and Terror       Manos: The Hands of Fate              You have no doubt not heard of probably 80% of those, and Melania is easily       the highest profile film on the list. For now, anyway. It was a 1.1/10, the       all-time worst, about 24 hours ago, but it's inched up slightly.       Screenshot 2026-02-02 091724       Melania       IMDB              What's going on here? Well, two things:              IMDB and Metacritic do not require some sort of proof a user has seen the       movie in question when they score it. Not to say that Melania is not a bad       movie (critics seem pretty emphatic that it is), but these votes can also       be used as a protest metric against her and the administration.              Rotten Tomatoes, meanwhile, has a system where you can link a ticket       purchase to make your review "verified, " which is where that 99% score       comes from. 1) If you are someone who is interested enough in Melania Trump       to legitimately go out and see the Melania movie, you are probably going to       like it and score it high. 2) Reading through these often oddly articulate       reviews, it is easy to doubt the legitimacy of at least some of them, and       theoretically buying a handful of tickets to be able to post reviews to       boost the score is not something that would be terribly hard to do.              We'll see what Melania does in its second weekend, but it is likely to be a       movie that's frontloaded by fans of the First Lady and unlikely to boost       its earnings through word of mouth in future weeks. Though it has indeed       exceeded earnings expectations, critic and user scores aside. Stacked up       against what Amazon paid for it is a different story, however.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca