XPost: alt.politics.uk   
   From: none@ofyourbusiness.com   
      
   On 2/15/2026 12:30 PM, Mars Sellus wrote:   
   > On Sun, 15 Feb 2026 04:50:22 -0500   
   > Focus Of Parabola wrote:   
   >   
   >> I live in the United States, but Trump is not my President.   
   >   
   > Take your H1B visa and GO HOME then.   
   >   
      
   Why Blitzkrieg Failed in Russia   
   Blitzkrieg didn’t “stop working” in some abstract sense — it hit the   
   limits of what fast, shock‑based warfare can do when confronted with   
   geography, logistics, industrial depth, and an enemy that refuses to   
   collapse. The sources you pulled highlight these exact constraints.   
      
   Below is the breakdown, tied directly to what the evidence shows.   
      
   1. The Soviet Union didn’t collapse as expected   
   Germany assumed the USSR would fall like France — quickly,   
   psychologically, and politically. Instead, the Soviets absorbed   
   catastrophic losses and kept fighting.   
      
   This single miscalculation doomed the entire concept of a short,   
   decisive campaign.   
      
   2. Vast distances broke the logistics   
   Blitzkrieg depends on fuel, spare parts, ammunition, and constant   
   mobility. The Russian steppe turned that into a nightmare:   
      
   Supply lines stretched hundreds of miles   
      
   Trucks and tanks wore out faster than they could be repaired   
      
   Fuel shortages slowed armored spearheads   
      
   Rail gauges were incompatible   
      
   The documentary source explicitly notes that logistical limits across   
   the Russian steppe were a decisive factor.   
      
   3. Time, mud, and winter killed momentum   
   Blitzkrieg is a race against the clock. Russia turned it into a slog:   
      
   Rasputitsa (autumn mud) immobilized vehicles   
      
   Winter froze equipment and men   
      
   Temperatures destroyed engines and lubricants   
      
   The IWM source shows the offensive grinding to a halt just 20 km from   
   Moscow before the Soviet winter counterattack.   
      
   4. Soviet industrial relocation and manpower depth   
   The Soviets moved entire factories east of the Urals, out of German   
   reach, and ramped up production. They also mobilized millions of new   
   soldiers.   
      
   The video source emphasizes Soviet industrial depth and mobilization as   
   a key reason Blitzkrieg lost effectiveness.   
      
   Germany had no answer for an enemy that could replace losses faster than   
   they could be inflicted.   
      
   5. Hitler’s interference destroyed maneuver warfare   
   Blitzkrieg requires flexible, decentralized command. Hitler replaced   
   that with:   
      
   “Stand fast” orders   
      
   No tactical withdrawals   
      
   No operational regrouping   
      
   The source explicitly notes that Hitler’s orders destroyed maneuver   
   warfare, which is the heart of Blitzkrieg.   
      
   6. The campaign was too big for Blitzkrieg to solve   
   Blitzkrieg works best against:   
      
   Small or medium states   
      
   Limited fronts   
      
   Weak or disorganized defenders   
      
   The USSR was none of these. It was a continental empire with:   
      
   Enormous territory   
      
   Massive population   
      
   Immense industrial capacity   
      
   A political system willing to absorb horrific losses   
      
   The IWM source makes clear that Germany’s early success masked the fact   
   that the Soviet Union simply did not break.   
      
   7. By 1942–43, Blitzkrieg was dead   
   The turning points — Moscow, Stalingrad, Kursk — marked the irreversible   
   end of Blitzkrieg as an offensive strategy.   
      
   After that, Germany fought a defensive war of attrition it could never win.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|