Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.trump    |    The politics of badass Donald Trump    |    145,682 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 145,503 of 145,682    |
|    Stephen Miller, White House Deputy to All    |
|    Trump Has Lost The Supreme Court    |
|    21 Feb 26 07:19:43    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.global-warming       XPost: rec.arts.tv       From: un-americans@trump.org              He now considers them fools and lapdogs for the Rhinos and the radical left       Democrats.              He needs to sign a Imperial Decree dissolving them.              Tariffs ruling is major blow to Trump's second-term agenda of taxing the       shit out of the middle class and poor to fund tax cuts for the 1%.                            Donald Trump had been warning for months that a Supreme Court decision like       this would be catastrophic.              If the court curtailed his ability to impose these tariffs, he had said, it       would be an "economic and national security disaster".              A six-justice majority of the Supreme Court, in ruling against the       president on Friday, didn't care much about his concerns.              Congress, not the president, has the power to impose tariffs, the justices       ruled. And nothing in the law that the president based his tariffs on, the       Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, delegated such sweeping powers to       Trump.              Trump, in a hastily arranged press conference on Friday afternoon, lashed       out at the justices who ruled against him. He said he was "ashamed" of the       three conservatives who struck down his tariffs and called the three       liberals on the court a "disgrace".              Trump then promised to reimpose tariffs using presidential authority       available under other laws, including a new temporary 10% global tariff       that he said he would sign on Friday.              The court's decision represents a rare check on this president's broad use       of executive authority.              A majority of the justices over the past year have shown a willingness to       allow Trump to press ahead with his agenda, particularly on immigration and       reshaping the federal government, even as legal challenges work their way       through the court system.               Follow reaction to ruling as it happens        Trump tariffs ripped up global trade order. What now?              This case, which was fast-tracked through the court system as an emergency,       slams the door on one such expansive use of presidential authority.              With several other major cases involving controversial uses of executive       power, such as efforts to end birthright citizenship and to dismiss a       Federal Reserve governor based on alleged improprieties, this may not be       Trump's only setback in the coming months.              At the very least, this decision weakens Trump's hand when trying to force       other nations to make concessions to the US and tarnishes his veneer of       invincibility.              Weakness begets weakness, and America's trading partners may be emboldened       to take a tougher line with the US now that the president's tariff powers       have been curtailed.              It also opens up the possibility that the Trump administration may have to       give back much of the tariff revenue it collected over the past year.              While the justices left this thorny issue to be decided by a lower court,       Brett Kavanaugh in his dissent warned that the process is likely to be a       "mess".              The Trump administration had plenty of time to prepare for Friday's       decision.              Supreme Court precedent, and the attitude of many of the justices when the       case was argued in court last November, indicated that an adverse outcome       for the president was quite possible.              Jamieson Greer, Trump's top trade adviser, said last month that the White       House has "a lot of different options" on how to proceed if the tariffs       were struck down.              "The reality," he said, "is the president is going to have tariffs as part       of his trade policy going forward."              The other options that could be at Trump's disposal are more limited,       however.              They require government agencies to produce detailed reports to justify       imposing tariffs, and they have limits on their scope and duration.              Gone are the days when the president could threaten, or enact, triple-digit       tariffs with the wave of a pen or the click of a Truth Social post.       Getty Images A large container ship with lots of cargo on board is in       foreground with Miami skyline behind Getty Images       A Rotterdam container ship prepares to dock at Port Miami              New tariffs will require a longer lead-in time before they are imposed.              That could limit the kind of economic disruption that took place when the       president announced his expansive "Liberation Day" tariffs last year, and       would give other nations more time to prepare their responses.              If Trump wants to restore his free hand to impose new tariffs, he could       always ask Congress for the kind of explicit authorisation that the Supreme       Court has said is necessary. But with narrow Republican majorities in the       House and Senate, and midterm elections looming, the success of such a move       seems unlikely.              In fact, some of Trump's conservative allies in Congress may be breathing       somewhat easier with this decision.              The president's tariffs - and the costs they have imposed on consumers -       have been unpopular among many Americans. Republican candidates in       battleground states and congressional districts would have been open to       Democratic attacks for supporting Trump's policies.                            That area of vulnerability has been reduced for now.              Friday's decision will set up an awkward moment on Tuesday, when Trump       delivers his annual State of the Union Address to a joint session of       Congress. Traditionally, many of the Supreme Court justices sit in the       front row of the chamber.              The president, after spending months issuing dire warnings against the       court, could stand eye-to-eye with the justices who eroded one of the key       pillars of Trump's second-term agenda.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca