From: D-E-M-I-G-O-D@SHAW.CA   
      
   "Chris"  wrote in message   
   news:HBdqb.107751$RP2.14481@twister.tampabay.rr.com...   
   > It's funny, really funny.   
   >   
   > Arguments like this are the typical   
   > excusatory bullshit I come to expect   
   > from people who want to deliver a   
   > verbal message of some kind.  People   
   > who "preach" really hate it when someone   
   > tries to make it illegal for them to   
   > talk to those who don't want to listen.   
   >   
   > Bottom line is, you're acqknowledging   
   > the fact that they are offended, that   
   > they feel so strongly about not wanting   
   > to hear you preaching to them that   
   > they are seeking legislation to prevent   
   > it, yet you don't understand what   
   > the "big deal" is?  Silly, and unlikely.   
      
   WTF, let those superstitious cultists preach all they want, as long as   
   they are paying for being allowed to do so, while covering own expenses   
   on their own...   
      
   I think it should be OK, as long as they don't impose their cult's   
   rituals in schools and public places, where they rob others of their   
   time which wasn't planned to spend on listening crappy prayers.   
      
   What is NOT OK, is that those cults are given a break during tax   
   collections. Because uniformity of such collections is being violated.   
   Every religious temple should be paying its dues just like every other   
   business, instead of getting tax rebates.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)