XPost: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.guns, alt.current-events.usa   
   XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.bush, alt.law-enforcement   
   From: tinc@dnaco.netREMOVETHIS   
      
   On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:07:35 GMT, "D E M I G O D"   
    wrote:   
      
      
   >Why should you resort to such amazingly ridiculous twist? 180 degrees   
   >off the face from the meaning of my words (complimenting the words of a   
   >previous poster) is certainly indicating the level of perversion which   
   >you employ to "interpret" clear positions of others (that do not   
   >require anyone's interpretation).   
      
   I must be confused then.  I thought that you opposed hunting.  Are you   
   saying that you oppose hunting but you are not a hate-filled fanatic   
   who wants to kill all hunters?  If so then you are unique in the   
   anti-hunting crowd.   
      
   >My good guess would be is that you are avoiding the issue, because   
   >resolving it would hurt YOUR interests, and attacking the messenger   
   >with goal of distraction  from that issue, in your incredibly perverse   
   >political game.   
      
   My "perverse political game" is to preserve the rights of honest   
   people while trying to reduce crime.  Exactly the opposite of the gun   
   control lobbyists who believe that anybody who opposes gun control   
   should be shot.   
      
   --   
   "Whoever is advising them on gun control should be shot."   
    - Blaine Rummel, spokesman for the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence.   
   Source: "Democrats shunning gun control", Washington Times, 31 May 2003   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)