XPost: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.guns, alt.current-events.usa   
   XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.bush, alt.law-enforcement   
   From: D-E-M-I-G-O-D@SHAW.CA   
      
   "Rex Tincher"  wrote in message   
   news:sdjnqv0lnk5ion75a5gjmm2ga7tucufpjm@4ax.com...   
   >   
   > control lobbyists believe that anybody   
   > who opposes gun control should be shot.   
      
   Even if in your interpretation I'm a "lobbyist", I must be not of that   
   crowd then, eh..., because I have not suggested shooting those opposing   
   gun control...   
   In my interpretation "controlling guns" means their whereabouts, and in   
   whose hands they are. Registering guns is a fair thing to do, because   
   their  appropriation in case of failure of gun holder to abide the   
   rules, would be impossible otherwise. You don't want to be shot by a   
   gun owner who decides to rob you naked in your own house, after beating   
   the shits out of you just to have a kick out of it, do you?   
      
   How do you figure that those without guns are able to shoot firearms   
   holders, especially without being shot back by those who are more   
   likely to do so?   
   >   
   > --   
   > "Whoever is advising them on gun   
   > control should be shot."   
   >  - Blaine Rummel   
   Have you noticed my name is NOT "Blaine Rummel"?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)