XPost: talk.politics.drugs, talk.politics.guns, alt.current-events.usa   
   XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican   
   XPost: alt.politics.bush, alt.law-enforcement   
   From: D-E-M-I-G-O-D@SHAW.CA   
      
   "G."  wrote in message news:   
   3fac77ee$0$3499$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...   
      
   > Well there you go, i thought an   
   > unbiased Jewish publication?   
      
   No tabloid is "unbiased", especially with the tags of "Jewish",   
   "Christian", "Muslim", etc.  Even every individual has one's own   
   biases, opinions and partialities. So, when those individuals are   
   working together, in passing their collective concept of particular   
   religious cult, or controversial to universal standards ideas, as their   
   goal, it is certainly NOT impartial.   
      
   Calling barbarism of individuals ( or sadistic brutalities committed by   
   groups of people ) , their assaults on others, dissimilar to them in   
   some way, destruction of their property and plain old vandalism   
   "anti-Semitism" is stupid.  Because it can be just as well be named as   
   "Semitism".   
      
   I'd prefer to call a spade a spade, regardless of the perpetrators'   
   justification for committing their atrocities.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)