From: ron.sam{please-remove}@cox.net   
      
   "Critter"  wrote in message   
   news:raBrb.156917$Fm2.138397@attbi_s04...   
   >   
   > "rl"  wrote in message   
   > news:mGArb.10137$G7.1439@okepread04...   
   > > ---snip---   
   > > > It's hardly rational to consider all ex-convicts to be dagerous thugs.   
   > > This   
   > > > is a common perception these days, and it's very weak minded.   
   > >   
   > > Don't try to imply anything different.  You and I both know better.   
   From   
   > > the asshole who even gets his jollies victimizing other crimms in the   
   > joint   
   > > to the sheep faced bastards who turn the other way while he beats the   
   crap   
   > > out of some poor jerk whose only crime (since conviction) was not   
   looking   
   > > down when he passed the pencil dicked asswipe on the tier....they're god   
   > > damned animals.   
   >   
   >   
   > So then, you will admit that you are AFRAID or ex-convicts ? That you lay   
   > awake at night FEARING them ? And you are utterly TERRORIZED by the things   
   > that you keep telling yourself about ex-cons ?   
   >   
   > Is that what you are trying to convey here ?   
      
      
   The day that you walk into a prison environment and not feel fear is the day   
   you better hang it up and walk away.   
   I don't know how much more simply I can put it.  You are surrounded by as   
   many as 1000 animals who have proven beyond a reasonable doubt their   
   willingness to victimize you and/or any other person who they perceive as   
   having something they want.   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > > > But speaking of Kobe - why was this girl not terrified of him ? Maybe   
   > > > because he is not an ex-con ? She trusted him because he is a   
   > non-felon -   
   > > > RIGHT? She probably also wanted to fuck him, otherwise she would not   
   > have   
   > > > dragged him to her room.   
   > >   
   > > More convict mentality apologist crap...   
   >   
   >   
   > Just a point of view which does not coincide with yours. but then, why   
   > should it. You are getting a paycheck from the industry which promotes   
   > irrational fear.   
      
   Hardly.  Your point of view is engendered, maintained, and encouraged to   
   flourish within a subset of our culture that essentially believes in the law   
   of the jungle.  You take what you want, when you want it, from whomever has   
   it that you feel bold enough to take it from.  It is, quite frankly, as   
   simple as that.   
      
      
   > By the way - you did not answer the question. Kobe Bryant is not an   
   ex-con -   
   > is he ? So why are you not bitching your little dicksucker at the evils of   
   > non-felons ? Maybe because your world is black and white ?   
      
   I did answer your question quite pointedly.  You've just chosen not to read   
   the answer.  But I'm sure you'll forget you've asked this question when you   
   respond to me a few paragraphs down...   
      
   >   
   >   
   > > > How is it possible that a non-felon would rape the   ? I thought that   
   > all   
   > > > the evil people were all felons ! He must be innocent if he's not an   
   > > ex-con.   
   > >   
   > > Maybe he just hasn't been caught yet.  Did you get caught the first time   
   > you   
   > > strayed over the line?   
   >   
   >   
   > And then again, there are ex-cons who might never reoffend, but that aint   
   in   
   > your vocabulary. Is it.   
      
   See what I told you?  Predictable.  Mathematical.  Logical.  Given any set   
   of circumstances, the world boils down to a series of choices that, from the   
   outside, may seem overwhelmingly complex and impossible to predict - yet to   
   the trained mind it is little more than a lesson in probability.  And so we   
   come inexhorably to the question posed by all convicts at some point:  That   
   of their "goodness" or their ability to repent - are the actions they have   
   been found guilty of some sort of snafu - the poor choice of a person   
   stressed through circumstance or chemical imbalance - or, indeed, is it   
   something much more sinister - truly an indication of evil residing within   
   the person - a "dark seed" if you will?   
      
   I'm sorry I can't answer that question for you.  I know what the statistics   
   say.  About half of you will reoffend and continue to plague society.  But   
   that leaves the other half, doesn't it?  That glimmer of hope....the Light   
   at the End of the Tunnel....the belief that you have the power to turn it   
   around and reaffirm yourself as a productive member of society.  That you   
   truly are a "good" person in a "bad" happenstance.  You have at least a   
   50-50 chance if the numbers are to be believed, no?   
      
   But, sadly, "No" is indeed the answer.  Because there is no way for the   
   numbers to reflect the people in your fraternity who are never again caught   
   violating the law, is there?  And certainly no way to seperate the man from   
   his deeds.  Who knows what lurks in a Man's heart?  What he is strong enough   
   to repress or control vs. that which he inflicts upon his fellow Man?  All I   
   can share with you is my perception of you:  And that is based entirely upon   
   what you write here and nothing more.  The very undercurrent of what you   
   share exposes a propensity to believe that the victims of crime have gotten   
   exactly what they deserve.  In the case of our friend, Kolbe Bryant, he was   
   just taking that which was his birthright as a Man-Animal to take.  If the   
   little bitch didn't want it, she shouldn't have gone to his room, right?   
      
   Very dark.  And very sad.   
      
   >   
   >   
   > > > I'm so preoccupied victimizing people. Yeah - thats' a hot one. Just   
   > suck   
   > > > me.   
   > >   
   > > See the mentality?  Even in trying to play some macho come-back crap,   
   you   
   > > can't help but fall back to that which you know best and are most   
   > > comfortable with.  The position of power as expressed by sexual   
   dominance.   
   > > Pathetic.  And yet, so true to form and predictable.   
   >   
   >   
   > Shit comes out of both ends of you - dont it ?   
      
      
   And in frustration with his inability to prove or deny his very propensity   
   to act and think as an animal, the beast lashes out in typical, mindless   
   rage.  Ever conscious of the fact that each word, each utterance simply adds   
   another layer of refinement to the supposition...   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > > > > > Maybe she was victimized somehow. That is not my problem. I am not   
   > the   
   > > > > one.   
   > > > > > I didn't do a damn thing to her, in fact I found the bitch very   
   > > > > irritating.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > So you didn't get to her first.  I'm sure that's quite a   
   > disappointment.   
   > > > > But at least someone else in your fraternal organization did, right?   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > I would'nt have fucked that bitch if she looked like Marylin Monroe. I   
   > > > did'nt like her attitude. I've been with too many psycho sluts to know   
   > > when   
   > > > I'm gettign tangled with a LOONIE.   
   > >   
   > > What?  You scared of hanging around the kind of sociopath that you and   
   the   
   > > rest of your ilk represent to the rest of us law abiding citizens?   
   >   
   >   
   > I did'nt like the bitch before she found out I was an ex-con and I did'nt   
   > like her afterwards either. The fact that she really wanted/needed a good   
   > horsefucking is not my problem. She terrorized herself with her own mind   
   and   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)