From: ron.sam{please-remove}@cox.net   
      
   "Critter"  wrote in message   
   news:a0Yrb.166356$Tr4.443352@attbi_s03...   
   > > > So then, you will admit that you are AFRAID or ex-convicts ? That you   
   > lay   
   > > > awake at night FEARING them ? And you are utterly TERRORIZED by the   
   > things   
   > > > that you keep telling yourself about ex-cons ?   
   > > >   
   > > > Is that what you are trying to convey here ?   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > The day that you walk into a prison environment and not feel fear is the   
   > day   
   > > you better hang it up and walk away.   
   > > I don't know how much more simply I can put it.  You are surrounded by   
   as   
   > > many as 1000 animals who have proven beyond a reasonable doubt their   
   > > willingness to victimize you and/or any other person who they perceive   
   as   
   > > having something they want.   
   >   
   >   
   > So you admit you are afraid. I sympathize.  BOOOOOO !   
      
   Of course I am.  Only a blithering idiot wouldn't be.  DUUUUUUHHHHHH!   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > > > > > But speaking of Kobe - why was this girl not terrified of him ?   
   > Maybe   
   > > > > > because he is not an ex-con ? She trusted him because he is a   
   > > > non-felon -   
   > > > > > RIGHT? She probably also wanted to fuck him, otherwise she would   
   not   
   > > > have   
   > > > > > dragged him to her room.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > More convict mentality apologist crap...   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > Just a point of view which does not coincide with yours. but then, why   
   > > > should it. You are getting a paycheck from the industry which promotes   
   > > > irrational fear.   
   > >   
   > > Hardly.  Your point of view is engendered, maintained, and encouraged to   
   > > flourish within a subset of our culture that essentially believes in the   
   > law   
   > > of the jungle.  You take what you want, when you want it, from whomever   
   > has   
   > > it that you feel bold enough to take it from.  It is, quite frankly, as   
   > > simple as that.   
   >   
   >   
   > Well, if I'm going to be accused of this then I might as well start living   
   > that way.   
      
   You've already proven your willingness to do just that.  To pretend   
   otherwise is, at the very least, intellectually dishonest.   
      
   > Otherwise I would be "paying" for crimes which were never   
   > comitted. I would be getting shortchanged. You're right - to make things   
   > more equitable I should probably crank up my offending a notch or two.   
      
   Well, thanks for being honest at least.  I can appreciate the fact that,   
   unlike many of the other crimms in here, you don't mind letting your true   
   self hang out.   
      
   >   
   >   
   > > > By the way - you did not answer the question. Kobe Bryant is not an   
   > > ex-con -   
   > > > is he ? So why are you not bitching your little dicksucker at the   
   evils   
   > of   
   > > > non-felons ? Maybe because your world is black and white ?   
   > >   
   > > I did answer your question quite pointedly.  You've just chosen not to   
   > read   
   > > the answer.  But I'm sure you'll forget you've asked this question when   
   > you   
   > > respond to me a few paragraphs down...   
   >   
   >   
   > You did'nt answer because you cant. In your world, non-felons are just   
   nice   
   > little people who say things like "kudos to you" and go to tea parties and   
   > shit. You refuse to ackonwledge that felons are only a SMALL part of the   
   > complex problem known to simple minds like yours - as crime.   
      
   I don't know if they represent a small or a large portion - but I certainly   
   don't think it matters one hoot to the issue at hand - whether or not it is   
   reasonable for God fearing, Law abiding citizens to experience a certain   
   amount of apprehension or fear when they find themselves in the presence of   
   a convicted felon.   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > > > > > How is it possible that a non-felon would rape the   ? I thought   
   > that   
   > > > all   
   > > > > > the evil people were all felons ! He must be innocent if he's not   
   an   
   > > > > ex-con.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Maybe he just hasn't been caught yet.  Did you get caught the first   
   > time   
   > > > you   
   > > > > strayed over the line?   
      
   The question above has survived two iterations of your inane ramblings, but   
   you've yet to answer it directly.  I wonder why?   
      
      
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > And then again, there are ex-cons who might never reoffend, but that   
   > aint   
   > > in   
   > > > your vocabulary. Is it.   
   > >   
   > > See what I told you?  Predictable.  Mathematical.  Logical.  Given any   
   set   
   > > of circumstances, the world boils down to a series of choices that, from   
   > the   
   > > outside, may seem overwhelmingly complex and impossible to predict - yet   
   > to   
   > > the trained mind it is little more than a lesson in probability.  And so   
   > we   
   > > come inexhorably to the question posed by all convicts at some point:   
   > That   
   > > of their "goodness" or their ability to repent - are the actions they   
   have   
   > > been found guilty of some sort of snafu - the poor choice of a person   
   > > stressed through circumstance or chemical imbalance - or, indeed, is it   
   > > something much more sinister - truly an indication of evil residing   
   within   
   > > the person - a "dark seed" if you will?   
   >   
   >   
   > You're babbling like a rabid bitch in heat.   
      
   My thoughts and comments were meant and directed more toward the general   
   readership.  I knew they would be beyond your comprehension level.  As a   
   matter of fact, I would imagine most topics beyond food and the next orifice   
   you can stuff your penis into are pretty much beyond you.  Maybe that has   
   more to do with your inability to secure gainful employment than your   
   felonious past?   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > > I'm sorry I can't answer that question for you.  I know what the   
   > statistics   
   > > say.  About half of you will reoffend and continue to plague society.   
   But   
   > > that leaves the other half, doesn't it?  That glimmer of hope....the   
   Light   
   > > at the End of the Tunnel....the belief that you have the power to turn   
   it   
   > > around and reaffirm yourself as a productive member of society.  That   
   you   
   > > truly are a "good" person in a "bad" happenstance.  You have at least a   
   > > 50-50 chance if the numbers are to be believed, no?   
   > >   
   > > But, sadly, "No" is indeed the answer.  Because there is no way for the   
   > > numbers to reflect the people in your fraternity who are never again   
   > caught   
   > > violating the law, is there?  And certainly no way to seperate the man   
   > from   
   > > his deeds.  Who knows what lurks in a Man's heart?  What he is strong   
   > enough   
   > > to repress or control vs. that which he inflicts upon his fellow Man?   
   All   
   > I   
   > > can share with you is my perception of you:  And that is based entirely   
   > upon   
   > > what you write here and nothing more.  The very undercurrent of what you   
   > > share exposes a propensity to believe that the victims of crime have   
   > gotten   
   > > exactly what they deserve.  In the case of our friend, Kolbe Bryant, he   
   > was   
   > > just taking that which was his birthright as a Man-Animal to take.  If   
   the   
   > > little bitch didn't want it, she shouldn't have gone to his room, right?   
   > >   
   > > Very dark.  And very sad.   
   >   
   >   
   > The very same words you have used to describe the victims of prison rape.   
   > "If they did'nt want to be gang raped, then they should not have gone to   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)