From: ron.sam{please-remove}@cox.net
"Critter" wrote in message
news:_Fgsb.174897$Tr4.475841@attbi_s03...
>
> "rl" wrote in message
> news:2Ocsb.3645$vJ3.306@okepread05...
> > "Critter" wrote in message
> > news:a0Yrb.166356$Tr4.443352@attbi_s03...
> > > > > So then, you will admit that you are AFRAID or ex-convicts ? That
> you
> > > lay
> > > > > awake at night FEARING them ? And you are utterly TERRORIZED by
the
> > > things
> > > > > that you keep telling yourself about ex-cons ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is that what you are trying to convey here ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The day that you walk into a prison environment and not feel fear is
> the
> > > day
> > > > you better hang it up and walk away.
> > > > I don't know how much more simply I can put it. You are surrounded
by
> > as
> > > > many as 1000 animals who have proven beyond a reasonable doubt their
> > > > willingness to victimize you and/or any other person who they
perceive
> > as
> > > > having something they want.
> > >
> > >
> > > So you admit you are afraid. I sympathize. BOOOOOO !
> >
> > Of course I am. Only a blithering idiot wouldn't be. DUUUUUUHHHHHH!
>
>
> chicken ?
Now that's a different matter entirely, isn't it? A "chicken" wouldn't walk
back in, day after day, putting his life on the line in order to serve his
fellow citizens. And don't even think we do it for the money.
>
>
> > > > > > > But speaking of Kobe - why was this girl not terrified of him
?
> > > Maybe
> > > > > > > because he is not an ex-con ? She trusted him because he is a
> > > > > non-felon -
> > > > > > > RIGHT? She probably also wanted to fuck him, otherwise she
would
> > not
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > dragged him to her room.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More convict mentality apologist crap...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Just a point of view which does not coincide with yours. but then,
> why
> > > > > should it. You are getting a paycheck from the industry which
> promotes
> > > > > irrational fear.
> > > >
> > > > Hardly. Your point of view is engendered, maintained, and
encouraged
> to
> > > > flourish within a subset of our culture that essentially believes in
> the
> > > law
> > > > of the jungle. You take what you want, when you want it, from
> whomever
> > > has
> > > > it that you feel bold enough to take it from. It is, quite frankly,
> as
> > > > simple as that.
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, if I'm going to be accused of this then I might as well start
> living
> > > that way.
> >
> > You've already proven your willingness to do just that. To pretend
> > otherwise is, at the very least, intellectually dishonest.
>
>
> The false accusation constitutes a license. Thank you.
Then you were falsely accused and convicted? My, this is certainly a
different tack for one of our resident crimms to take.
>
>
> > > Otherwise I would be "paying" for crimes which were never
> > > comitted. I would be getting shortchanged. You're right - to make
things
> > > more equitable I should probably crank up my offending a notch or two.
> >
> > Well, thanks for being honest at least. I can appreciate the fact that,
> > unlike many of the other crimms in here, you don't mind letting your
true
> > self hang out.
>
>
> I'll hang my true self out for you anytime, right out of my fly.
Aside from the number of boy-asses you've undoubtedly stuffed it into, what
makes you think its any differnt from mine?
>
>
> > > > > By the way - you did not answer the question. Kobe Bryant is not
an
> > > > ex-con -
> > > > > is he ? So why are you not bitching your little dicksucker at the
> > evils
> > > of
> > > > > non-felons ? Maybe because your world is black and white ?
> > > >
> > > > I did answer your question quite pointedly. You've just chosen not
to
> > > read
> > > > the answer. But I'm sure you'll forget you've asked this question
> when
> > > you
> > > > respond to me a few paragraphs down...
> > >
> > >
> > > You did'nt answer because you cant. In your world, non-felons are just
> > nice
> > > little people who say things like "kudos to you" and go to tea parties
> and
> > > shit. You refuse to ackonwledge that felons are only a SMALL part of
the
> > > complex problem known to simple minds like yours - as crime.
> >
> > I don't know if they represent a small or a large portion - but I
> certainly
> > don't think it matters one hoot to the issue at hand - whether or not it
> is
> > reasonable for God fearing, Law abiding citizens to experience a certain
> > amount of apprehension or fear when they find themselves in the presence
> of
> > a convicted felon.
>
>
> Incorrect. Their fear is in their own minds. They have been brainwashed to
> fear. If people are not being "corrected" by the "department of
> corrections", then you guys are simply not doing your jobs and need to be
> fired.
We are "correcting" crimms in precisely the manner our bosses - namely the
Courts and Free Citizens say crimms should be corrected. But you do have a
valid point. It doesn't work. I've got a method guaranteed to work. But
this would entail taking a hard look at the people who victimize others and
making some tough, politically incorrect decisions about how big a price
they should pay for their activities.
>
>
> > > > > > > How is it possible that a non-felon would rape the ? I
thought
> > > that
> > > > > all
> > > > > > > the evil people were all felons ! He must be innocent if he's
> not
> > an
> > > > > > ex-con.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe he just hasn't been caught yet. Did you get caught the
> first
> > > time
> > > > > you
> > > > > > strayed over the line?
> >
> > The question above has survived two iterations of your inane ramblings,
> but
> > you've yet to answer it directly. I wonder why?
>
>
> Does it really matter ? When people such as yourself have clearly admitted
> to "straying" over the line yourself ??
Of course it does. Especially given your position that Kolbe wasn't a
crimm. Are you daft? Have you completely lost the ability to follow an
exchange beyond the basics of:
FOOD! - GRUNT...SNIFF...WIPE...CUM!
And if I have strayed over the line and simply not been caught, I guess that
just makes me a little smarter than you and Kolbe, right?
>
>
> > > > > And then again, there are ex-cons who might never reoffend, but
that
> > > aint
> > > > in
> > > > > your vocabulary. Is it.
> > > >
> > > > See what I told you? Predictable. Mathematical. Logical. Given
any
> > set
> > > > of circumstances, the world boils down to a series of choices that,
> from
> > > the
> > > > outside, may seem overwhelmingly complex and impossible to predict -
> yet
> > > to
> > > > the trained mind it is little more than a lesson in probability.
And
> so
> > > we
> > > > come inexhorably to the question posed by all convicts at some
point:
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
