home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.prisons      Not always a Johnny Cash song      3,649 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,046 of 3,649   
   Critter to All   
   Re: Inmate Computer Technicians (1/3)   
   13 Nov 03 02:08:52   
   
   From: Barking@The.Moon   
      
   > > > > > > So then, you will admit that you are AFRAID or ex-convicts ?   
   That   
   > > you   
   > > > > lay   
   > > > > > > awake at night FEARING them ? And you are utterly TERRORIZED by   
   > the   
   > > > > things   
   > > > > > > that you keep telling yourself about ex-cons ?   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Is that what you are trying to convey here ?   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > The day that you walk into a prison environment and not feel fear   
   is   
   > > the   
   > > > > day   
   > > > > > you better hang it up and walk away.   
   > > > > > I don't know how much more simply I can put it.  You are   
   surrounded   
   > by   
   > > > as   
   > > > > > many as 1000 animals who have proven beyond a reasonable doubt   
   their   
   > > > > > willingness to victimize you and/or any other person who they   
   > perceive   
   > > > as   
   > > > > > having something they want.   
   > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > > So you admit you are afraid. I sympathize.  BOOOOOO !   
   > > >   
   > > > Of course I am.  Only a blithering idiot wouldn't be.  DUUUUUUHHHHHH!   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > chicken ?   
   >   
   > Now that's a different matter entirely, isn't it?  A "chicken" wouldn't   
   walk   
   > back in, day after day, putting his life on the line in order to serve his   
   > fellow citizens.  And don't even think we do it for the money.   
      
   I know. You do it for all the gay sex.   
      
   > > > > > > > > But speaking of Kobe - why was this girl not terrified of   
   him   
   > ?   
   > > > > Maybe   
   > > > > > > > > because he is not an ex-con ? She trusted him because he is   
   a   
   > > > > > > non-felon -   
   > > > > > > > > RIGHT? She probably also wanted to fuck him, otherwise she   
   > would   
   > > > not   
   > > > > > > have   
   > > > > > > > > dragged him to her room.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > More convict mentality apologist crap...   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Just a point of view which does not coincide with yours. but   
   then,   
   > > why   
   > > > > > > should it. You are getting a paycheck from the industry which   
   > > promotes   
   > > > > > > irrational fear.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Hardly.  Your point of view is engendered, maintained, and   
   > encouraged   
   > > to   
   > > > > > flourish within a subset of our culture that essentially believes   
   in   
   > > the   
   > > > > law   
   > > > > > of the jungle.  You take what you want, when you want it, from   
   > > whomever   
   > > > > has   
   > > > > > it that you feel bold enough to take it from.  It is, quite   
   frankly,   
   > > as   
   > > > > > simple as that.   
   > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Well, if I'm going to be accused of this then I might as well start   
   > > living   
   > > > > that way.   
   > > >   
   > > > You've already proven your willingness to do just that.  To pretend   
   > > > otherwise is, at the very least, intellectually dishonest.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > The false accusation constitutes a license. Thank you.   
   >   
   > Then you were falsely accused and convicted?  My, this is certainly a   
   > different tack for one of our resident crimms to take.   
      
      
   Do you deny that the false accusation constitutes a license?   
      
      
   > > > > Otherwise I would be "paying" for crimes which were never   
   > > > > comitted. I would be getting shortchanged. You're right - to make   
   > things   
   > > > > more equitable I should probably crank up my offending a notch or   
   two.   
   > > >   
   > > > Well, thanks for being honest at least.  I can appreciate the fact   
   that,   
   > > > unlike many of the other crimms in here, you don't mind letting your   
   > true   
   > > > self hang out.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > I'll hang my true self out for you anytime, right out of my fly.   
   >   
   > Aside from the number of boy-asses you've undoubtedly stuffed it into,   
   what   
   > makes you think its any differnt from mine?   
   >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > > > > > By the way - you did not answer the question. Kobe Bryant is not   
   > an   
   > > > > > ex-con -   
   > > > > > > is he ? So why are you not bitching your little dicksucker at   
   the   
   > > > evils   
   > > > > of   
   > > > > > > non-felons ? Maybe because your world is black and white ?   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > I did answer your question quite pointedly.  You've just chosen   
   not   
   > to   
   > > > > read   
   > > > > > the answer.  But I'm sure you'll forget you've asked this question   
   > > when   
   > > > > you   
   > > > > > respond to me a few paragraphs down...   
   > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > > You did'nt answer because you cant. In your world, non-felons are   
   just   
   > > > nice   
   > > > > little people who say things like "kudos to you" and go to tea   
   parties   
   > > and   
   > > > > shit. You refuse to ackonwledge that felons are only a SMALL part of   
   > the   
   > > > > complex problem known to simple minds like yours - as crime.   
   > > >   
   > > > I don't know if they represent a small or a large portion - but I   
   > > certainly   
   > > > don't think it matters one hoot to the issue at hand - whether or not   
   it   
   > > is   
   > > > reasonable for God fearing, Law abiding citizens to experience a   
   certain   
   > > > amount of apprehension or fear when they find themselves in the   
   presence   
   > > of   
   > > > a convicted felon.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Incorrect. Their fear is in their own minds. They have been brainwashed   
   to   
   > > fear. If people are not being "corrected" by the "department of   
   > > corrections", then you guys are simply not doing your jobs and need to   
   be   
   > > fired.   
   >   
   > We are "correcting" crimms in precisely the manner our bosses - namely the   
   > Courts and Free Citizens say crimms should be corrected.  But you do have   
   a   
   > valid point.  It doesn't work.  I've got a method guaranteed to work.  But   
   > this would entail taking a hard look at the people who victimize others   
   and   
   > making some tough, politically incorrect decisions about how big a price   
   > they should pay for their activities.   
      
      
   You can start immediately - first on trial will be the BATF for the murders   
   at WACO.   
      
      
   > > > > > > > > How is it possible that a non-felon would rape the   ? I   
   > thought   
   > > > > that   
   > > > > > > all   
   > > > > > > > > the evil people were all felons ! He must be innocent if   
   he's   
   > > not   
   > > > an   
   > > > > > > > ex-con.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Maybe he just hasn't been caught yet.  Did you get caught the   
   > > first   
   > > > > time   
   > > > > > > you   
   > > > > > > > strayed over the line?   
   > > >   
   > > > The question above has survived two iterations of your inane   
   ramblings,   
   > > but   
   > > > you've yet to answer it directly.  I wonder why?   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Does it really matter ? When people such as yourself have clearly   
   admitted   
   > > to "straying" over the line yourself ??   
   >   
   > Of course it does.  Especially given your position that Kolbe wasn't a   
   > crimm.  Are you daft?  Have you completely lost the ability to follow an   
   > exchange beyond the basics of:   
   > FOOD! - GRUNT...SNIFF...WIPE...CUM!   
   >   
   > And if I have strayed over the line and simply not been caught, I guess   
   that   
   > just makes me a little smarter than you and Kolbe, right?   
      
      
   How do I get your nasty saliva off my dick ?   
      
      
   > > > > > > And then again, there are ex-cons who might never reoffend, but   
   > that   
   > > > > aint   
   > > > > > in   
   > > > > > > your vocabulary. Is it.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > See what I told you?  Predictable.  Mathematical.  Logical.  Given   
   > any   
   > > > set   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca