From: rrufiange@cfl.rr.com   
      
   "rl"  wrote in message   
   news:7Cqtb.17$PJ6.16@okepread05...   
   > And if I own my own company, why the hell should I be subjected to laws   
   that   
   > force me to hire people I don't want to hire?  If I don't want to hire any   
   > stinking Whiteys, that's my business.  And if the Whiteys catch onto this   
   > and stop coming to my establishment, that's their business.  It's no   
   > different than forcing bar owners to enforce "no smoking in public" rules   
   in   
   > their establishments.  If he wants to let people smoke in his bar, what   
   > business is it of the stinking big brother government?   
      
   Actually, even with this protection in place, people will still be denied   
   work, regardless.   
      
   It's illegal to deny work based on gender, social off-work activities,   
   etc..., but work is denied for those same reasons every day.  All they have   
   to do is find any reason not to hire you.  In reality, most states don't   
   even require you to give a reason why you choose not to hire someone.  When   
   court rolls around, they'll find a reason, whatever it may end up being   
   after they consult with their attorneys and "cook the books".   
      
   Even if you win, and these companies are stopped from getting their way   
   legally, they'll just get their way illegally.  You won't be able to prove   
   contrary, either.  All they need is a tiny discrepancy in the paperwork,   
   missed classes back in the past, a "better applicant" somewhere...anything.   
   There are even books published on ways to find an applicant not worthy for   
   hiring, while still being within the law.  The corporate machine is way, way   
   ahead of you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)