From: Barking@The.Moon   
      
   "Chris"  wrote in message   
   news:uqawb.33133$KI4.26033@twister.tampabay.rr.com...   
   >   
   > "Critter"  wrote in message   
   > news:Kd9wb.216797$9E1.1167667@attbi_s52...   
   >   
   > > Chrissy, your opinion clearly shows that the jury system cant work in   
   the   
   > > US. Too many people like yourself who are so uneducated that they would   
   > > allow their mind to confuse suspicion with presumption of guilt.   
   >   
   > Well, since you're going to call me Chrissy, I'll go ahead and resume   
   > calling you by the title of plunger-boy.   
   >   
   > Because I believe he is guilty, I must be uneducated?  Show us how that   
   > works.   
   >   
   > Suspicion is presumption.  The difference, is conviction.   
      
      
   Suspicion is not the same as presumption, Jacko-bait. The man is PRESUMED   
   innocent, but SUSPECTED guilty.   
      
   Got it ? Now quit playing around with daddy's beige colored toys and go back   
   to the leggo box.   
      
      
   > > > His life will be in no danger.  He's a mega-millionaire.  His lawyers   
   > will   
   > > > work out some freakish deal where he'll serve house arrest, or be   
   under   
   > > > constant doubled guard.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Poppycock.   
   >   
   > How many mega-millionaires can you compare this case to, and validate your   
   > claim?   
      
      
   As soon as rl finishes me off, then you can assume the position. Just get in   
   line right behind him.   
      
      
   > > I have changed the laws. All of them. Would you like to read the laws   
   that   
   > > I've rewritten on my own behalf ? I'll be happy to show them to you.   
   >   
   > So, you're a legislator?   
      
      
   Thats right smart ass - I have passed a whole new set of laws which I have   
   personally certified as authentic, they are personal ordinances, and I deem   
   you to be in violation. You owed me 10 blow jobs.   
      
      
   > > > It is not up to these prosecutors in California to remedy problematic   
   > > prison   
   > > > conditions.  It's their job to decide upon prosecuting criminal   
   > offenders.   
   > > > Under the current laws, such situations would be relegated to other   
   > > > departments.  But you already knew that, right?   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Wrong. I have never heard a prosecutor complaining that he feels uneasy   
   > that   
   > > the guy he just convicted for car theft or smoking pot might wind up   
   > getting   
   > > raped or murdered in prison. I have never heard them crying out at the   
   > > inhumanity of such a situation. Instead, there is tremendous competition   
   > for   
   > > the job of prosecutor. People are chomping at the bit to pull the switch   
   > on   
   > > someone, as long as they can get away with it.   
   >   
   > This is about reporting prison misconduct to the proper departments, not   
   > about whether or not a prosecutor feels uneasy with a pre-existing   
   > conviction.  They are NOT the same concerns.   
      
      
   You are a cop, or some cop's kid - right ? I thought so.   
      
   Let me explain why this is wrong behaviour for a DA or prosecutor.   
      
   They know that prison conditions in California are so extreme that they   
   could easily be compared to Auschwitz or any other Nazi camp. Knowing this,   
   they do not protest at the duty of sending someone to their death. Rather,   
   they do all they can to encourage yet harsher conditions for inmates.   
      
   They are part of the machinery which furnishes society with a never ending   
   supply of man's inhumanity to man. You can thank them for a large portion of   
   crime which exists today.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)